By rossonero Go To PostHappy birthday, everyone!
Disso, pls. Less about football and its rules, more about football transfer muppetry and money laundering.
By Scum Go To PostDisso, pls. Less about football and its rules, more about football transfer muppetry and money laundering.Say no more, captain.
I for one welcome the new rules. It never really made sense to me why a goal is a goal only when the entire ball goes over the line, but offside a player only needs to be partially over.
They were just making it up as they went along, innit.
By Perfect Blue Go To PostSay no more, captain.
I for one welcome the new rules. It never really made sense to me why a goal is a goal only when the entire ball goes over the line, but offside a player only needs to be partially over.
cant wait to fall to my knees at the convinience store once admin releases the Rice + Timber double announcement
By Xpike Go To Postcant wait to fall to my knees at the convinience store once admin releases the Rice + Timber double announcement
By JesalR Go To PostMauricio Pochettino is a fucking slag
Seems Xhaka move is close to being official which means Rice is probably also close to being official
By Xpike Go To PostSeems Xhaka move is close to being official which means Rice is probably also close to being official
By Perfect Blue Go To PostDid we talk about the new offside rule?
As far as I can see there isn’t one.
By Laboured Go To PostAs far as I can see there isn’t one.Disso just out there, blatantly bending the rules.
By Perfect Blue Go To PostYou’re right. Seems to be proposed still?seems like a pretty stupid rule change that will lead to lower lines as it would be extremely easy for any speedy forward to keep a toe in
That's a better fee than was being talked about earlier on, still would rather he stays but no point keeping him here with a year left on his contract if he wants to move on.
By Xpike Go To Postseems like a pretty stupid rule change that will lead to lower lines as it would be extremely easy for any speedy forward to keep a toe inYeah it's an awful rule. The only change that should be made is that offside should be based purely on the feet of the player.
There was one Pukki goal against Spurs a couple years ago that looked ridiculous.
By Plasma Go To Postfootball.london sounds like a trustworthy site
That's a better fee than was being talked about earlier on, still would rather he stays but no point keeping him here with a year left on his contract if he wants to move on.
By Scum Go To Post
Will end up being a real bargain.
By Perfect Blue Go To PostYou’re right. Seems to be proposed still?So stupid
exact same problem still exist, few mm either side on/off and now completely unworkable for a defender (besides the head start that players like Mbob clearly need). Than again, don't think defending has ever been taken in to consideration with any offside rule chance.........we need more goals pls
By Scum Go To PostWhere’s Horse? He’ll love this.He's out celebrating his birthday.
Burnley spending £15m on a 'keeper who has never played higher than league one. And some of our numb support think Patterson isn't worth £10m+.
My response to Jamie Redknapp was as a result of him telling me that night at Chelsea ‘I’ll be at your house when you get home - hanging out of the back of Julia and Jemma’. I wonder if this little nugget will get much traction? Somehow I doubt it.
What he said was edited from a carefully edited tape. ‘Hanging out of the back of….’ Redknapp’s phraseology. Not mine. I simply mimicked it. As I did with ‘smash it’. Does anyone seriously believe I’m childish enough to use phrases like that?
Randomly remembered this from his blog last week
By Laboured Go To PostDidnt shareholders threaten to sue if they didn't accept the Qatari bid?
Disgusting, but unsurprising. Always been a massive wanker, despite what the edited and falsified posts in my history might say
Telegraph printing more details about this than I thought they'd attempt. It's a 29 year old man originally arrested in North London.
By n8 dogg Go To PostDamn.
Rotten to the core
Educate me if I'm wrong but given the strict financial situation United find themselves in can they not get a player on loan with like an obligation to buy? This would shift paying the payment to next summer. Obviously it would require the selling club to agree to it but what would be the implications of that with regards to FFP?
I wonder if the epl has a watchful eye on the Saudi league.
Makes sense to probably spend the billions on the players that increase the value of your own product rather than billions on teams. Maybe that was just phase one of the plan. They're not in a bad time zone too which I think is a huge factor.
Makes sense to probably spend the billions on the players that increase the value of your own product rather than billions on teams. Maybe that was just phase one of the plan. They're not in a bad time zone too which I think is a huge factor.