By s y Go To Postcan't trump just use an invisible poison dart like the russians?how many countries are old school fortresses tho
If it was that easy Obama wouldn't have impressed no one with his stealth bomber fly over a few years back
Granted, I don't think their 1% would risk fucking up their harem setup over nuking America of all countries...
This Syria shit is dumb tho
So we went from it can't happen to sneak attack might be the move...... once again why the fuck did the orange turf say that out loud then?
Like I am 100% sure it was brought up to him in a meeting early as a "final solution" to stop just short of nuking them and this asshole sees it as something that makes him sound cool (and isn't Russian related) and immediately repeats it to the world like he is talking hypotheticals on the Howard Stern show.
Like I am 100% sure it was brought up to him in a meeting early as a "final solution" to stop just short of nuking them and this asshole sees it as something that makes him sound cool (and isn't Russian related) and immediately repeats it to the world like he is talking hypotheticals on the Howard Stern show.
By Zeus Ex Machina Go To PostSo we went from it can't happen to sneak attack might be the move…… once again why the fuck did the orange turf say that out loud then?They're the same thing.
Like I am 100% sure it was brought up to him in a meeting early as a "final solution" to stop just short of nuking them and this asshole sees it as something that makes him sound cool (and isn't Russian related) and immediately repeats it to the world like he is talking hypotheticals on the Howard Stern show.
It can't happen because it'd be impossible to support, and the -only- way it could happen is hitting first - because of the whole Seoul and the majority of its inhabitants being killed in hours thing.
Its been one of the only proactive solutions to the Korean peninsula for the past 30-40 years. Have our capabilities increased in that time? Absolutely. But in even the best case scenarios, the ones that include magic and several hundreds of artillery shells being duds, you're looking at a body count that would make Afghanistan look like a paintball fight.
NK and the preemptive strike thing has been in the playbook forever. Obama flew stealth bombers over their capital in response to previous saber rattling. I think Clinton or Bush had a sub flex off their shores too.
Its nothing new. If shit pops off it'll be because that clock finally hit zero really... each president has passed this off. Every UN summit. If their capabilities and intent are that legit then what would you have the country do? What other country is threatening us with nuclear war openly?
By DY_nasty Go To PostGranted, I don't think their 1% would risk fucking up their harem setup over nuking America of all countries…
This is where I'm at. Same with nuking SK. Both end in their eventual demise. This is dictator dick swinging. But it's like, man, swing that shit closer and closer and you're gonna get smacked at some point.
I never thought they would be this brazen, really. I sorta figured status quo would continue on in perpetuity. If this did end though, I never thought this would end diplomatically. I think we could deal with the humanitarian aspects. I do not think this admin would deal well.
By Fenderputty Go To PostThis is where I'm at. Same with nuking SK. Both end in their eventual demise. This is dictator dick swinging. But it's like, man, swing that shit closer and closer and you're gonna get smacked at some point.I don't think there's any comparison or reference point for that kind of humanitarian effort.... plus you'd have 3 of the biggest dick swingers in the world trying to play hearts in minds on top of a critical point in pacific arena that's already got a ton of fresh new moving pieces.
I never thought they would be this brazen, really. I sorta figured status quo would continue on in perpetuity. If this did end though, I never thought this would end diplomatically. I think we could deal with the humanitarian aspects. I do not think this admin would deal well.
Even if NK imploded tomorrow, glorious leader killed by a whore and his staff largely defected in the night, it'd qualify as a bigger crisis than everything that Obama had to deal with I think. (unless I'm forgetting something massive right now)
It would take world wide collaboration to deal with the results probably. Which is why this admin would suck at doing it
By Fenderputty Go To PostIt would take world wide collaboration to deal with the results probably. Which is why this admin would suck at doing it
No China would get stuck with the majority bill for the most part. Arguably the second main reason they deal with NK (besides it being a buffer to SK and American influence) is because they have no interest dealing with that amount of ignorant refugees that would run to them if NK collapses.
By DY_nasty Go To PostThey're the same thing.
It can't happen because it'd be impossible to support, and the -only- way it could happen is hitting first - because of the whole Seoul and the majority of its inhabitants being killed in hours thing.
Its been one of the only proactive solutions to the Korean peninsula for the past 30-40 years. Have our capabilities increased in that time? Absolutely. But in even the best case scenarios, the ones that include magic and several hundreds of artillery shells being duds, you're looking at a body count that would make Afghanistan look like a paintball fight.
NK and the preemptive strike thing has been in the playbook forever. Obama flew stealth bombers over their capital in response to previous saber rattling. I think Clinton or Bush had a sub flex off their shores too.
Its nothing new. If shit pops off it'll be because that clock finally hit zero really… each president has passed this off. Every UN summit. If their capabilities and intent are that legit then what would you have the country do? What other country is threatening us with nuclear war openly?
Like I understand that, and your probably right this is just more saber rattling. Trump probably won't do it too, this was just his normal talk a lot of tough guy nonsense bullshit. If anything it's as much my own weariness of his overall intelligence that got me worried but somebody should be able to explain why it's better to leave NK a stalemate
Why does everyone blame Obama for syria when infact the fault is pretty much entirely Ed Millibands fault.
By DY_nasty Go To PostI'd panic more but I love Mattis
Dude wants out already
By Kidjr Go To PostWhy does everyone blame Obama for syria when infact the fault is pretty much entirely Ed Millibands fault.
Being the leader of the free world means you don't get to pass the buck.
His statement is hilarious.
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-04-06/nunes-recuses-himself-from-house-intelligence-russia-probe
"The radical left is complaining so I have to step down. They're so terrible!"
“Several leftwing activist groups have filed accusations against me with the Office of Congressional Ethics,” Nunes of California said Thursday in an emailed statement. “The charges are entirely false and politically motivated, and are being leveled just as the American people are beginning to learn the truth about the improper unmasking of the identities of U.S. citizens and other abuses of power.”
https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-04-06/nunes-recuses-himself-from-house-intelligence-russia-probe
"The radical left is complaining so I have to step down. They're so terrible!"
By Dark PhaZe Go To PostDude wants out alreadya testament to his sanity
Donald Trump’s chief strategist Stephen Bannon has called the president’s senior advisor and son-in-law Jared Kushner a “cuck” and a “globalist” during a time of high tension between the two top aides, several Trump administration officials told The Daily Beast.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2017/04/06/steve-bannon-calls-jared-kushner-a-cuck-and-globalist-behind-his-back.html
If I were an American I would probably spend a good chunk of the day fuming about guys who barely qualify intellectually as functional adults getting to be in charge of my life.
When exactly did the term "cuck" become a major thing (as in the go-to political insult), anyway? It's everywhere these days and all I can think about whenever I hear the word is fetish pornography.
By Francis Go To PostWhen exactly did the term "cuck" become a major thing (as in the go-to political insult), anyway? It's everywhere these days and all I can think about whenever I hear the word is fetish pornography.
According to this it started on 4chan in 2014, spread through the alt-right/PUA weirdosphere from there.
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/cuck
By KingGondo Go To PostNuclear Option invoked by Senate Republicans.
Good job Schumer.
Indeed, he did and excellent job. He held a bunch of pansy Dems in line.
The filibuster was never a real thing if it's blown up at first opportunity. Waiting to have it blown up later is silly. Force their hand and deal with reality
By livefromkyoto Go To PostAccording to this it started on 4chan in 2014, spread through the alt-right/PUA weirdosphere from there.
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/cuck
This. If you see it used in a non ironic way, that person is probably on the same level as Bannon character wise.
The legislative Filibuster isn't going anywhere anytime soon I think. I thought Trump could strong arm this into reality a couple months ago, but his polling combined with his healthcare negotiation with the HFC has probably left him with little pull. Turtle aint nuking the legislative filibuster with the house feeding him garbo.
Theoretically the SCOTUS should require bipartisan support so the position doesn't become a political one. Polarization is a bitch though and here we are.
Theoretically the SCOTUS should require bipartisan support so the position doesn't become a political one. Polarization is a bitch though and here we are.
Fender, there's a really good write up on Reuters regarding that earlier discussion.
Brings in SK's admin change into the equation and spells out NK's long game a bit more.
Can't link from mobile tho
Brings in SK's admin change into the equation and spells out NK's long game a bit more.
Can't link from mobile tho
By livefromkyoto Go To PostAccording to this it started on 4chan in 2014, spread through the alt-right/PUA weirdosphere from there.Yeah I thought it got popular again as a shot at white liberal men.
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/cuck
By DY_nasty Go To PostYeah I thought it got popular again as a shot at white liberal men.
If you're a REAL MAN you're the boss of your woman all the time. Because deep down that's what women really want, a true alpha. I think we all know that. It's just common sense. According to science it's how their genes know they're going to have boss babies.
Namby pamby liberal male feminists might win over some ugly fatties with horn rimmed glasses at their college safe space parties, but deep down those women will 100% long for a real alpha male to get their hormones going, and cheat on them. Liberals are cucks. It's just science.
Buy my eBook now to learn more and stop dreaming and win the WOMAN OF YOUR DREAMS and BECOME THE MAN YOU ALWAYS WANTED TO BE.
Also, check out my Manve$ting $ystem to get your finances pumped, and watch for my seminar weekend tour coming to a suburban Ramada Inn near you soon.
MAGA
Bannon fighting a losing battle. He aint winning out against the son in law.
Watch Breitbart go full 180 in a years time
Watch Breitbart go full 180 in a years time
MAGA
And for the record, we have more business in Myanmar than Syria these days. When Russia brokered that deal, we had our options shredded...
The Rohingya persecution is absolutely mind-boggling.
By Dark PhaZe Go To PostBannon fighting a losing battle. He aint winning out against the son in law.He's cooked. Can't win unless he starts dropping sex tapes.
Watch Breitbart go full 180 in a years time
And for the record, we have more business in Myanmar than Syria these days. When Russia brokered that deal, we had our options shredded...
The Rohingya persecution is absolutely mind-boggling.
He didn't just call him a "cuck" either. It's being reported he called him a "globalist" as well. Which is the alr right slur for Jew with money / power.
By Fenderputty Go To PostHe didn't just call him a "cuck" either. It's being reported he called him a "globalist" as well. Which is the alr right slur for Jew with money / power.globalist cuck is the mother of all insults
Man, it's only been 11 weeks?
Couldn't repeal and replace the ACA, his Muslim ban got rejected by courts twice, his NSA had to resign because he was in the pocket of the Russians, he's being investigated by the FBI and CIA for potential collusion with Putin, he hasn't passed a single piece of legislation and his campaign pillars (the wall, tax reform, infrastructure) don't seem super likely with the completely fractured state of the GOP.
Most successful.
Couldn't repeal and replace the ACA, his Muslim ban got rejected by courts twice, his NSA had to resign because he was in the pocket of the Russians, he's being investigated by the FBI and CIA for potential collusion with Putin, he hasn't passed a single piece of legislation and his campaign pillars (the wall, tax reform, infrastructure) don't seem super likely with the completely fractured state of the GOP.
Most successful.
Looks like the US has changed its position and will go after Assad now lol
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson: "steps are under way" to organize an international coalition to remove Syria's Assad.
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson: "steps are under way" to organize an international coalition to remove Syria's Assad.
By reilo Go To PostHow filthy do your fingers and keyboard keys feel after you wrote that?
I'm putting the word "psychology" on all future products.
By Dark PhaZe Go To PostLooks like the US has changed its position and will go after Assad now lolWe're gonna kick out Assad and make him pay for it
Secretary of State Rex Tillerson: "steps are under way" to organize an international coalition to remove Syria's Assad.
By DY_nasty Go To Postglobalist cuck is the mother of all insults
Coming from the perspective of an Alt Righter ... it is. Especially when levied against a rich Jewish man. It's amazing how Trump has stacked so many opposing sides beside him.
By Fenderputty Go To PostComing from the perspective of an Alt Righter … it is. Especially when levied against a rich Jewish man. It's amazing how Trump has stacked so many opposing sides beside him.Straight out of Rick and Morty tbh lol
Also, this meeting with Xi... ugh we about to get rekt. Its been real Taiwan.
Twitter Inc said in a lawsuit on Thursday that it had received a demand from U.S. officials for records that could reveal the user behind an account opposed to President Donald Trump and that it was challenging the demand in court.The most successful, indeed.
The lawsuit over the account @ALT_uscis, claimed to be run by federal immigration employees, was filed in federal court in San Francisco, where Twitter is based.
Following Trump's inauguration in January, anonymous Twitter feeds voicing concerns at more than a dozen U.S. government agencies appeared to challenge the president's views on climate change and other issues.
"The rights of free speech afforded Twitter’s users and Twitter itself under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution include a right to disseminate such anonymous or pseudonymous political speech," Twitter said in the lawsuit.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which is a defendant in the lawsuit, declined to comment on pending litigation.
The company said it received an administrative summons last month demanding that it provide records related to the account. The acronym CIS refers to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, and the account's description refers to itself as "immigration resistance."
Option A: Continue Status quo and do nothing while blaming the past admin for doing nothing
Option B: Do something but fuck it up because this admin is horrible.
Option B: Do something but fuck it up because this admin is horrible.
By reilo Go To PostMar a Lago lmao
That 35% approval rating must have hit hard, Operation Violent Distraction is underway. Nobody hates a war president!
If the US decide to "join" this war more actively now it's going to cause a huge fucking disaster. Assad might ultimately end up being removed, but then what?
Too little and too damn late.
Too little and too damn late.
This isn't going to be messy at all. Nope. Not at all.
Also ... the CIA knew about Russia trying to get Trump elected before anyone has been lead to believe.