By Pac-12 Go To PostBecause I onlyhavewant one shot, don't miss your chance to blow, this opportunity only comes once in a lifetime
Dude, the needles they use on these injections are freaking microscopic thin. And it LITERALLY takes like half a second to administer it. My 5 year old just had 3 vaccines two weeks ago and didn't even flinch.
Get the better vaccine, those needles ain't shit.
It's not about the needles, not afraid of any needle. I just don't want multiple appointments. One goddamn appointment and it's over.
If it was 365 needles but they mailed them to me directly, shit would be fine, too. [joke] I could chase that shit with heroin. [/joke]
If it was 365 needles but they mailed them to me directly, shit would be fine, too. [joke] I could chase that shit with heroin. [/joke]
Eh, 2 appts split between 4 weeks isn't a biggie. I was in and out today for my 2nd shot in 5 minutes.
Low key worried though about the side effects once I go to sleep. It's been 12 hours since the shot
Low key worried though about the side effects once I go to sleep. It's been 12 hours since the shot
Look, Alpha. It's hard for Pac-12 to lug that walker around. His finest tennis balls are wearing thin.
By LunaticNotFounder Go To PostPedja about to be changed to Racismo Pedja.🤔🤔🤔
70% of Cayman’s population aged over 16 have received at least one dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. So close to opening up. New government will hopefully announce something tomorrow.
Side effects today were fairly minimal. Can't say they laid me out, but I did feel warm and fever-ish, although without an actual fever msav confirmed clean disk. I felt some fatigue more than anything, and towards the end a headache that subsided after a shower fixboot and Advil help. scandiskNow I feel relatively normal. Hopefully I can fall asleep shutdown with ease.
By DiPro Go To Postwho actively wants J&J? that's the one you settle for.Pac is pac but a lot of people just wanted a one and done instead of going in twice, especially since the rollout been slow af in some places.
By FortuneFaded Go To PostJust got second Pfizer dose lads.
By Kibner Go To PostNice!
Getting mine in a couple hours.
welcome, brothers
Welcome to the Gates Network please provide us with your UserID so that we can provision your rights.
By LunaticNotFounder Go To PostWelcome to the Gates Network please provide us with your UserID so that we can provision your rights.
My MSDos won't boot correctly. Plz halp
By Patriotism Go To PostThats the most loads bill has dropped in timeThat’s why Melinda is leaving
By i can get you a toe Go To PostPac is pac but a lot of people just wanted a one and done instead of going in twice, especially since the rollout been slow af in some places.i get taking whatever you can, i woul've taken J&J if someone offered a month ago but if you can choose why go for that one? takes no time to get one and it's not painful and i haven't heard anybody being sick twice.
By DiPro Go To Posti get taking whatever you can, i woul've taken J&J if someone offered a month ago but if you can choose why go for that one? takes no time to get one and it's not painful and i haven't heard anybody being sick twice.
You haven't yet explained why if you could choose, why you would not go for that one? It's literally 1 appointment versus 2. Why would you not choose 1?
By Pac-12 Go To PostYou haven't yet explained why if you could choose, why you would not go for that one? It's literally 1 appointment versus 2. Why would you not choose 1?correct me if i'm wrong but J&J has the worst efficacy of the 4 big ones.
it's still very good at preventing deaths and hospitalizations so i would've taken it in a heartbeat if it's the only on offer but if i can choose i get Moderna or Pfizer.
My understanding from Dr. diehard is that those efficacy rates are apples and oranges due to being studied at different points on the pandemic curve.
My question for you is what do you plan to do with 2 Windows phones.
My question for you is what do you plan to do with 2 Windows phones.
I still haven't seen anyone with knowledge on the subject say it will actually help. It seems like they are just looking for a good headline.
I might be wrong but it seems like it would be like lifting the IP protections on GPU's to help their shortage, except that all the shortage are from manufacturing and has nothing to do with IP protections. It would just turn the supply chain into a shit show.
I might be wrong but it seems like it would be like lifting the IP protections on GPU's to help their shortage, except that all the shortage are from manufacturing and has nothing to do with IP protections. It would just turn the supply chain into a shit show.
na, a lot of countries could be producing vaccines. It will help a lot
Argentina will start producing Sputnik and Sinopharm in a few months.
Argentina will start producing Sputnik and Sinopharm in a few months.
assuming they actually do it, it would allow every country/region to potentially look into manufacturing for themselves instead of having to constantly import them (which limits both because of the price and because you can't ship too many at once), which would help a lot
but that's is assuming they do allow anyone to make them
but that's is assuming they do allow anyone to make them
Just a reminder that the UK themselves were reliant on a single EU company for materials in their supply chain. The idea that lower income countries are going to setup an entire supply chain, safely, in a matter months seems pretty damn optimistic to me.
By diehard Go To PostJust a reminder that the UK themselves were reliant on a single EU company for materials in their supply chain. The idea that lower income countries are going to setup an entire supply chain, safely, in a matter months seems pretty damn optimistic to me.This is a dumb argument not to remove the IP restrictions. If these countries want to figure manufacturing out for themselves, let them.
By reilo Go To PostThis is a dumb argument not to remove the IP restrictions. If these countries want to figure manufacturing out for themselves, let them.This a dumb argument to counter a "how is this impactful?" question.
Vaccine acceptance will already be a problem, this could exacerbate that.
By diehard Go To PostThis a dumb argument to counter a "how is this impactful?" question.You're presenting it as if it's a waste of time though. What's this hurting? Their profits? Oh no.
Vaccine acceptance will already be a problem, this could exacerbate that.
I'm all for finding the grey area between sterilizing kids and perfect intellectual harmony but it's not like you can "sure give it your best shot" this kinda thing. Tons of risk and better equipped nations can't even get shit right.
Even without the profit dance, getting something wrong on this magnitude should create pause across the board.
Even without the profit dance, getting something wrong on this magnitude should create pause across the board.
By reilo Go To PostYou're presenting it as if it's a waste of time though. What's this hurting? Their profits? Oh no.Well, its highly likely the quote from that story is about protecting profits:
“In the midst of a deadly pandemic, the Biden Administration has taken an unprecedented step that will undermine our global response to the pandemic and compromise safety,” said Stephen J. Ubi, the group’s president and CEO. “This decision will sow confusion between public and private partners, further weaken already strained supply chains and foster the proliferation of counterfeit vaccines. ”
Or, it's possible that it holds some truth. You can't just dismiss it completely because reasons.
By diehard Go To PostJust a reminder that the UK themselves were reliant on a single EU company for materials in their supply chain. The idea that lower income countries are going to setup an entire supply chain, safely, in a matter months seems pretty damn optimistic to me.There are countries like India, South Africa and Brazil that have the infrastructure in place to produce right away. That's the whole point of the argument about temporality releasing the patents.
Let's remember that if we still have outbreaks in other countries, chances are, the whole vaccination campaign in developed countries will be render useless in a few month by a new mutation
By diehard Go To PostOr, it's possible that it holds some truth. You can't just dismiss it completely because reasons.
I'm sure there will be some rules around the release or rather suspension of patents. For example I doubt any private company will be able to do it, instead it will be something more government-ran.
By Elchele Go To PostThere are countries like India, South Africa and Brazil that have the infrastructure in place to produce right away. That's the whole point of the argument about temporality releasing the patents.Aren't countries like India's production capabilities already going towards ones like Covishield?
Let's remember that if we still have outbreaks in other countries, chances are, the whole vaccination campaign in developed countries will be render useless in a few month by a new mutation
By Elchele Go To PostLet's remember that if we still have outbreaks in other countries, chances are, the whole vaccination campaign in developed countries will be render useless in a few month by a new mutationWell that's not true at all. Hundreds of mutations have already been sequenced and none have made existing vaccines ineffective.
By diehard Go To PostWell that's not true at all. Hundreds of mutations have already been sequenced and none have made existing vaccines ineffective.
Hasn't happened = won't happen? ok m8
I dunno we pretty much know coronaviruses well and can spin up a vaccines day of. We are entering a new age of medicine.
By LunaticNotFounder Go To PostI dunno we pretty much know coronaviruses well and can spin up a vaccines day of. We are entering a new age of medicine.I mean it took almost a year to get a vaccine in place because there's testing and regulations in the middle -and rightly so-. I'd rather not get into that circle every year.
By Elchele Go To PostHasn't happened = won't happen? ok m8You said chances are that will happen.
By Elchele Go To PostI mean it took almost a year to get a vaccine in place because there's testing and regulations in the middle -and rightly so-. I'd rather not get into that circle every year.It's certainly possible it becomes endemic and modified vaccines are required every so often. Supposedly modified vaccines won't require the same level of scrutiny that the initial ones were subject to.
I do think most of the opposition to elimination comes from the Zero-Covid slogan and the need to freakonomics every public policy decision.
OECD countries opting for elimination are Australia, Iceland, Japan, New Zealand, and South Korea.
Japan never crossed a 50.93 rating on lockdown strictness (out of 100) from the data they are using. Why are they included?
Their conclusion about which countries preferred mitigation also doesn't line up with the same data they are referencing (France, Germany, Ireland).
I suppose it's a little easier for island nations (and SK is effectively an island nation in this regard) to lock down hard.
By blackace Go To PostWith the great success England has had… oh…The UK didn't even try lol
Also I promise you Japan is fake news