By Pac-12 Go To PostThat feeling when you think everyone who clicked "like" now has a file at Secret ServiceRight.... Fungi out here putting us on kill lists
Dems need to take the issue to court to get the testimony they want at this point. I think its the best move. It'll take a long time, but with enough pressure, maybe one of them (Bolton) will be compelled to testify in the house after a while, particularly if something gets decided in the courts.
By Dark PhaZe Go To PostDems need to take the issue to court to get the testimony they want at this point. I think its the best move. It'll take a long time, but with enough pressure, maybe one of them (Bolton) will be compelled to testify in the house after a while, particularly if something gets decided in the courts.
Gonna be his third term before that happens.
By Fenderputty Go To PostGonna be his third term before that happens.
Dems could still hold impeachment in their back pocket even beyond the election. It's not out of the realm of possibility that Trump could get re-elected while Dems still see a majority in the house. In that case, if somethings there, then it's clearly the best option rather than letting the whole thing crash and burn within a sham trial.
Between how long the courts take, the dems could actually cheese this thing all the way until mid terms of 2022....imagine flipping the senate and suddenly handing over the articles lol.
The fukkery would be intense.
The fukkery would be intense.
By Dark PhaZe Go To PostDems could still hold impeachment in their back pocket even beyond the election. It's not out of the realm of possibility that Trump could get re-elected while Dems still see a majority in the house. In that case, if somethings there, then it's clearly the best option rather than letting the whole thing crash and burn within a sham trial.
Dems could impeach twice. Nothing saying we can't. Aint gonna matter with this senate. What he does aint gonna matter with this senate. Focus on beating him and move on.
By Dark PhaZe Go To PostDems could still hold impeachment in their back pocket even beyond the election. It's not out of the realm of possibility that Trump could get re-elected while Dems still see a majority in the house. In that case, if somethings there, then it's clearly the best option rather than letting the whole thing crash and burn within a sham trial.How about fielding a candidate worth a fuck first?
By Fenderputty Go To PostNone of the candidates are work fucking. This isn't party exclusive.It kinda is when promises of the massive blue wave crashing across America were made.
Now it's everybody ain't shit 😂
By blackace Go To PostIt kinda is when promises of the massive blue wave crashing across America were made.
Now it's everybody ain't shit 😂
I meant literally they're all not fuckable or, worth a fuck if you will. Unless you're into GILF' old man.
By Fenderputty Go To PostI meant literally they're all not fuckable or, worth a fuck if you will. Unless you're into GILF' old man.2020 isnt even 2 weeks old and we are almost in WW3 and might have the worst poli joke post of year.
Going to be a tough year
By blackace Go To Post2020 isnt even 2 weeks old and we are almost in WW3 and might have the worst poli joke post of year.
Going to be a tough year
Sounds like it's all uphill from here. Cheer up!
By blackace Go To PostHow about fielding a candidate worth a fuck first?enough of your radical ideas
I would ask you what candidate is worth a fuck, but the voters have already disagreed with you en masse
By Fenderputty Go To PostI would ask you what candidate is worth a fuck, but the voters have already disagreed with you en massemaybe they could've developed some instead of letting hillary and the dnc trample over anyone worth a damn leading up to 2016 lol. you can't force candidates down people's throat, stomp out anyone who's even halfway attractive to a podium, then be like "this is all we got - your fault btw"
edit: oh and you can't forget the industry plant candidates that get push too. kamala, beto, and pete? no one asked for them. i'm still tight about beto getting props for castro's work for his entire campaign in texas
By Facism Go To Post
By DY_nasty Go To Postmaybe they could've developed some instead of letting hillary and the dnc trample over anyone worth a damn leading up to 2016 lol. you can't force candidates down people's throat, stomp out anyone who's even halfway attractive to a podium, then be like "this is all we got - your fault btw"Worst part is the republicans didn't want Trump until they saw how he was just louder than other folks and winning with it
edit: oh and you can't forget the industry plant candidates that get push too. kamala, beto, and pete? no one asked for them. i'm still tight about beto getting props for castro's work for his entire campaign in texas
By DY_nasty Go To PostI'm expecting waaaay worse tbh. "Tens" is light.This is when we find out how tight Iran Russia and China really are
By DY_nasty Go To PostI'm expecting waaaay worse tbh. "Tens" is light.
Iran already saying this is One part of a larger effort? Toe Dipping?
By blackace Go To PostThis is when we find out how tight Iran Russia and China really area lot less tight than nato and the eu...
I wish our reporters were better man. I really do. If we were gonna catch rockets from Iran, it'd be hundreds over dozens of bases.
By DY_nasty Go To Posta lot less tight than nato and the eu…NK found out when China stopped answering their phone.
I wish our reporters were better man. I really do. If we were gonna catch rockets from Iran, it'd be hundreds over dozens of bases.
a lot of reports are saying missiles are flying all over the country, just going to have to wait a bit for a proper report.
By Facism Go To PostUnconfirmed reports of at least 20 US troops dead.
Take with a huge pinch of sea-salt of course.
If they're firing missiles like they're claiming, then wouldn't satellites have picked up those launches and warned soldiers to get in bunkers?
Not buying any 'casualties' number at all.
By HasphatsAnts Go To PostIf they're firing missiles like they're claiming, then wouldn't satellites have picked up those launches and warned soldiers to get in bunkers?
Not buying any 'casualties' number at all.
You'd think.
By HasphatsAnts Go To PostIf they're firing missiles like they're claiming, then wouldn't satellites have picked up those launches and warned soldiers to get in bunkers?Ya I posted without thinking. Way too early for any sort of real information, even if it's allowed to be disseminated in the first place.
Not buying any 'casualties' number at all.
Naw just its civilians.
The US has literally no winning move here.
Just another endless war or occupation.
The US has literally no winning move here.
Just another endless war or occupation.
By Lunatic Go To PostSo is Iran about to get its shit pushed in?
Iran ain’t Iraq
By Fenderputty Go To PostIran ain’t IraqDoes it really matter when you are up against the US Military?