By /sy Go To Posti mean, come onIs that from LA Noire?
Oh, oh, oh I just remembered I watched Gemini Man.
Holy fucking shit the CGI in that is beyond hilarious.
Holy fucking shit the CGI in that is beyond hilarious.
By Laboured Go To PostOh, oh, oh I just remembered I watched Gemini Man.Not even sure what that bike scene was
Holy fucking shit the CGI in that is beyond hilarious.
If it makes the film a bit worse than it would be otherwise, it's a hindrance no?
Even if it's splitting hairs over an incredible film
Even if it's splitting hairs over an incredible film
By Hitch Go To PostIf it makes the film a bit worse than it would be otherwise, it's a hindrance no?
Even if it's splitting hairs over an incredible film
Not if it’s splitting hairs or negligible. I can’t imagine watching the Godfather and caring one iota about the lack of realism in that fight scene.
Yeah that's something where Marty doesn't shine.
There are more examples of weird scenes.
The scene where he holds the head of the lady and shoots her. I mean he got his hand on the other side of the head and pulls the trigger more than once.
Or when Pesci gets killed in Goodfellas.
Just a minor part, but it doesn't really downgrade the movie at all.
There are more examples of weird scenes.
The scene where he holds the head of the lady and shoots her. I mean he got his hand on the other side of the head and pulls the trigger more than once.
Or when Pesci gets killed in Goodfellas.
Just a minor part, but it doesn't really downgrade the movie at all.
Scorsese regularly has scenes in his films where dialogue and actor’s mouths are massively out of sync too. It isn’t a mistake; he just decides he likes that particular shot or line reading is best and finds it works in the edit.
By Lunatic Go To PostHow the hell are y'all watching a 3.5 hour film during the week?I put it on while doing work. Lots of pauses though.
By blackace Go To Post4 day weekendOh shit forgot it was Thanksgiving. I guess that explains the release date.
Scorcese used to be all about angles too. Could have just filmed it from dudes angle getting boot to face then cuts to the kids reaction. Don't even need Deniro in the shot. Then you just see him take her arm and walk her away while she looks back at beat up dude like "fuck me."
By data Go To PostRewatching Once Upon A Time got me thinking, what are the best Steve McQueen movies?Hunger(2008)
Shame (2011).
By i can get you a toe Go To PostScorcese used to be all about angles too. Could have just filmed it from dudes angle getting boot to face then cuts to the kids reaction. Don't even need Deniro in the shot. Then you just see him take her arm and walk her away while she looks back at beat up dude like "fuck me."exactly... but opted for a junkyard dog sequence
By data Go To PostRewatching Once Upon A Time got me thinking, what are the best Steve McQueen movies?The Great Escape
Bullitt
The Blob
By Flutter Go To PostI put it on while doing work. Lots of pauses though.👏👏
This man knows how 21st century careers work
oh boy The Irishman: The Conversation is so good. Such a treat to watch Scorsese, De Niro, Pacino and Pesci in a room just riffing and talking about the movie.
By /sy Go To PostHunger(2008)Shame is top to bottom amazing.
Shame (2011).
Widows does not get enough respect.
was watching the irishman: in conversation on netflix and i saw that they used the de-aging effects on pesci as well--which blows me away because for some reason i thought that they only used it on de niro and that pesci looked young enough to pull the younger look off with makeup.
which leads me to the following: not once while watching it, did i think that pesci's face looked off.
de niro's face, even though you somewhat get used to it as the film goes on, looks off constantly. the first time you see him in the truck, very early in the film, you're almost shocked by how bad the effects look because of the dead look on his face.
why does it look so good on pesci, but not on de niro?
which leads me to the following: not once while watching it, did i think that pesci's face looked off.
de niro's face, even though you somewhat get used to it as the film goes on, looks off constantly. the first time you see him in the truck, very early in the film, you're almost shocked by how bad the effects look because of the dead look on his face.
why does it look so good on pesci, but not on de niro?
Pesci ran circles around both De Niro and Pacino in terms of acting in the movie. He managed to play a younger and older version of Russ wonderfully. The other two had a few problems, be it body language or makeup.
By bud Go To Poststeve mcqueen, the director, does very little for me.Better than Terrence Malick
By bud Go To Postwhy does it look so good on pesci, but not on de niro?it's the blue eyes.
that does make it worse, but that’s not all of it.
at times, the lighting on his face looked totally off as well.
at times, the lighting on his face looked totally off as well.
Also, Bobby D doesn't really look like he did when he was young and we know how he looked when he was that age so it throws you off
Need to think about the Irishman some more, but haven’t stopped since it finished. A genuine masterwork. Scorsese’s made three in a row
now, the mad bastard.
Seismic fuckin movie. Last hour had me choked up in its entirety.
now, the mad bastard.
Seismic fuckin movie. Last hour had me choked up in its entirety.
Watched Once Upon A Time In Hollywood this weekend. Didn't like it and is easily Quentin's worst. I really didn't like the final act. I thought the retconning of history was pretty disgusting. It reminds me of when Mark Walhberg said that if was on one of the planes on 9/11, he would have taken on the hijackers.