Centrist media is so trash.
Purportedly, the Fox News town hall had higher ratings than any other town hall Bernie has done on CNN/MSNBC.
So in that spirit, I'd now like to share an episode of Ben Shapiro's show.
Purportedly, the Fox News town hall had higher ratings than any other town hall Bernie has done on CNN/MSNBC.
So in that spirit, I'd now like to share an episode of Ben Shapiro's show.
By Smoke Dogg Go To PostPurportedly, the Fox News town hall had higher ratings than any other town hall Bernie has done on CNN/MSNBC.It's almost like Fox has Democrats host town halls on their network as ratings stunts to get their audience to hate watch and bring in leftists who think there might actually be something of substance to come from it (there won't).
No Democrat should go on their network. They don't put them on in good faith. It's all to goose ratings and so they can continue to say "fair and balanced, look at Bernie over here." You'd have to be a fucking mark to take them up on the offer.
trump jr literally colluding with wiki leaks in the report lol
the fact that technically none of this is "illegal" is all well and good...but holy shit
the fact that technically none of this is "illegal" is all well and good...but holy shit
there's enough here that if the dems don't completely throw themselves at impeachment, senate result and 2020 result be damned, they are cowards and fools
like you have to do it, full stop, if he gets another 4 years fine but you have to rebuke this in the strongest sense
like you have to do it, full stop, if he gets another 4 years fine but you have to rebuke this in the strongest sense
By rodeoclown Go To PostIt's almost like Fox has Democrats host town halls on their network as ratings stunts to get their audience to hate watch and bring in leftists who think there might actually be something of substance to come from it (there won't).
No Democrat should go on their network. They don't put them on in good faith. It's all to goose ratings and so they can continue to say "fair and balanced, look at Bernie over here." You'd have to be a fucking mark to take them up on the offer.
Nah, I think you're just lacking confidence in your ability to educate people in the face of taunts and dismissive berating.
So, in essence, it's almost like you're Tom Perez deciding that Democrats aren't going to have any presidential debates on Fox News.
No Democrat should take any of the DNC holdovers from Hilary's campaign in good faith either.
Going on Fox News was the right move precisely because it generated interest from both sides and maximized the viewership potential.
That it was Fox News whose ratings benefited from the spectacle is just another L for CNN/MSNBC.
By Lunatic Go To PostYou sure it's just now? You gave up most of your privacy rights because you were afraid of some Muslims.How very French of us
By Smoke Dogg Go To PostNah, I think you're just lacking confidence in your ability to educate people in the face of taunts and dismissive berating.Bernie definitely a mark ass mark
So, in essence, it's almost like you're Tom Perez deciding that Democrats aren't going to have any presidential debates on Fox News.
No Democrat should take any of the DNC holdovers from Hilary's campaign in good faith either.
Going on Fox News was the right move precisely because it generated interest from both sides and maximized the viewership potential.
That it was Fox News whose ratings benefited from the spectacle is just another L for CNN/MSNBC.
By blackace Go To PostBernie definitely a mark ass mark
And yet, still the first real homie out here to go on enemy territory and defend his positions. It is Fox News that got marked.
By Dark PhaZe Go To Posttrump jr literally colluding with wiki leaks in the report lol
the fact that technically none of this is "illegal" is all well and good…but holy shit
I've seen multiple "The potus and his campaign were just dumb patsy" arguments this morning and it's hilarious.
By Dark PhaZe Go To Postthere's enough here that if the dems don't completely throw themselves at impeachment, senate result and 2020 result be damned, they are cowards and fools
like you have to do it, full stop, if he gets another 4 years fine but you have to rebuke this in the strongest sense
Maybe, but it won't happen until after a subpoena of the full un-redacted report and probably not until after Mueller testifies.
By Smoke Dogg Go To PostAnd yet, still the first real homie out here to go on enemy territory and defend his positions. It is Fox News that got marked.
Fox News won't win him the south during the primary. It's the same mistakes he made in 2016. He cares too much about the rural white working class soft racist. But sure ... continue to bloviate about the intelligence of going on a right wing propaganda network. At least AOC is doing it right by doing a townhall in Kentucky for coal miners.
By blackace Go To PostBernie definitely a mark ass mark
He was only there for the good vibrations.
i could see bernie winning if biden fucks off for sure
but not sure if he will
i thought biden would be a good pick even if i wouldn't vote for him in the primary, but i'm starting to think that would be a mistake, "creepy joe" was always known, but put in video form--ehhhh, and centrism seeming like cancer these days...idk
would almost rather just let trump have 4 years and enjoy the epic pendulum swing than the half limp dicked shit we'd get from joe's reign, although that's coming from a "priviledged" position as compared to many people who would be more negatively impacted by 4 more years of trump
but not sure if he will
i thought biden would be a good pick even if i wouldn't vote for him in the primary, but i'm starting to think that would be a mistake, "creepy joe" was always known, but put in video form--ehhhh, and centrism seeming like cancer these days...idk
would almost rather just let trump have 4 years and enjoy the epic pendulum swing than the half limp dicked shit we'd get from joe's reign, although that's coming from a "priviledged" position as compared to many people who would be more negatively impacted by 4 more years of trump
By Fenderputty Go To PostFox News won't win him the south during the primary. It's the same mistakes he made in 2016. He cares too much about the rural white working class soft racist. But sure … continue to bloviate about the intelligence of going on a right wing propaganda network. At least AOC is doing it right by doing a townhall in Kentucky for coal miners.
Ok? But it'll win him the country during the general. And Hillary cares too much about the rural white working class hard racist. So you tell me what's really the mistake here.
By Smoke Dogg Go To PostOk? But it'll win him the country during the general. And Hillary cares too much about the rural white working class hard racist. So you tell me what's really the mistake here.
Who cares about Hillary? She’s not running. He’s got to win the primary before he wins the general
By Fenderputty Go To PostWho cares about Hillary? She’s not running. He’s got to win the primary before he wins the general
I agree with every thing you've just said.
Only, I want him to win the primary without the South, like he would have without the superdelegates being undemocratic in the Democrat party.
Thank you.
By Smoke Dogg Go To PostI agree with every thing you've just said.
Only, I want him to win the primary without the South, like he would have without the superdelegates being undemocratic in the Democrat party.
Thank you.
He wouldn’t have won shit in various northern states if it were not for the undemocratic caucuses. So FOH with that lame “superdelegate” crap. And you don’t get to bloviating about “Democratic” anything if you actively want to remove black voters from the south.
By Fenderputty Go To PostHe wouldn’t have won shit in various northern states if it were not for the undemocratic caucuses. So FOH with that lame “superdelegate” crap. And you don’t get to bloviating about “Democratic” anything if you actively want to remove black voters from the south.
You're just using black voters in the South as political cover to make some bullshit point about the South mattering at all for Democrats in the general.
You're just as lame.
i don't see how any of the others sans biden could really compete with bernie, but it's early days
still, cards are kinda out on the table at this point
still, cards are kinda out on the table at this point
By Dark PhaZe Go To Posttrump jr literally colluding with wiki leaks in the report lol
the fact that technically none of this is "illegal" is all well and good…but holy shit
By Dark PhaZe Go To Postthere's enough here that if the dems don't completely throw themselves at impeachment, senate result and 2020 result be damned, they are cowards and fools
like you have to do it, full stop, if he gets another 4 years fine but you have to rebuke this in the strongest sense
100 on all of this.
Privilege (and people that protect you) is a great super power to have. Football numbers should be given to everyone involved, but nope. Wish I could use these excuses on police.
By Smoke Dogg Go To PostYou're just using black voters in the South as political cover to make some bullshit point about the South mattering at all for Democrats in the general.
You're just as lame.
“Bernie was undemocratically blocked in 2016”
“Fuck the south voting in the primary”
“Your using black votes as political cover”
None of this squares up at face value. Bernie May win, and if he does I’ll vote for him, but you’re acting like an entitled hypocritical fuck but defending him.
How the FUCK do Barr and Hot Rod come to the conclusion that Trump did not commit obstruction of justice? It's all fuckin' there in the report.
By n8 dogg Go To PostHow the FUCK do Barr and Hot Rod come to the conclusion that Trump did not commit obstruction of justice? It's all fuckin' there in the report.
Rosenstein can’t do shit
Mueller felt there was evidence but that congress needed to act because of standing DOJ policy
Sony should advertise Ghosts of Tsushima using Game of Thrones imagery/font/quotes. It even has the same acronym so they don't have to change much, and HBO obviously doesn't mind.
By Smokey Go To PostSo there's no way Barr read any of this rightOf course he did.
but there's money to be made saving Trump
By Lunatic Go To PostDidn't Muller say the reason obstruction is unlikely is because no one followed Trump's orders 🤣no, that he failed to influenced the investigation because everyone refused his requests. Different matter.
By Lunatic Go To PostDidn't Muller say the reason obstruction is unlikely is because no one followed Trump's orders 🤣
He didn't say it was unlikely. He said he's not giving a legal recommendation based on his evidence because of standing DOJ policy and felt congress should act on his information. Barr went ahead and misrepresented this in the presser before anyone could read the report.
Bill Barr’s pre-spin on the Mueller report is looking shakier by the minute. The attorney general told us this morning that the White House had “fully cooperated” with the investigation.
Let’s not forget that Trump refused to be interviewed by Mueller – instead he only agreed to give written responses. Now, we get to see for the first time the president’s answers to the questions the special counsel posed him, reproduced as an appendix.
As a clearly exasperated Mueller notes, “the president stated on more than 30 occasions that he ‘does not recall’ or ‘remember’ or ‘have an independent recollection’” of information called for by the questions.
When you read Trump’s answers you can see what Mueller means. Take the first three responses the president gives relating to the Trump Tower meeting between his eldest son, Don Jr, and a group of Russians in June 2016.
They begin:
- “I have no recollection…”
- “Nor do I recall…”
- “I have no independent recollection…”
After he received these replies, Mueller went back to Trump and asked again for a face-to-face interview, given the “inadequacy of the written format”. Trump declined.
Let’s not forget that Trump refused to be interviewed by Mueller – instead he only agreed to give written responses. Now, we get to see for the first time the president’s answers to the questions the special counsel posed him, reproduced as an appendix.
As a clearly exasperated Mueller notes, “the president stated on more than 30 occasions that he ‘does not recall’ or ‘remember’ or ‘have an independent recollection’” of information called for by the questions.
When you read Trump’s answers you can see what Mueller means. Take the first three responses the president gives relating to the Trump Tower meeting between his eldest son, Don Jr, and a group of Russians in June 2016.
They begin:
- “I have no recollection…”
- “Nor do I recall…”
- “I have no independent recollection…”
After he received these replies, Mueller went back to Trump and asked again for a face-to-face interview, given the “inadequacy of the written format”. Trump declined.
Dems wanna play like they're so concerned but considering who they're bought and paid for by it's not even a big deal to them that Trump is in office. Hell stalling his shit out means they can play both sides to their hearts content. This is the same batch of people willing to compromise on the rights of oppressed persons. 2020 is gonna be a wash and it won't even bother them much, they're all about unfettered capitalism too where it suits their donors.
By Dark PhaZe Go To Post
Supposedly Nadler should be issuing a subpoena to Barr tomorrow for the full report. It will be challenged in court, but it's the houses duty for oversight so they should get it in the end. Nadler was smart to wait until Barr played his hand before issuing a subpoena.
America will always be a farce so long as that organizations and politics aren't reviewed from the outside in. Long as you can investigate and absolve yourself, pick your judge and jury what is there to expect. Hell the President even being able to fuck around in the Judiciary is a blantant contradiction in how the branches should be separate especially so that the courts can protect our constitutional freedoms. But whatever. America is jokes.
By DY_nasty Go To Postsomeone should do something
😂😂😂
dems literally cowards who would never
House Majority Leader: "Impeachment is not worthwhile at this point"
“Based on what we have seen to date, going forward on impeachment is not worthwhile at this point. Very frankly, there is an election in 18 months and the American people will make a judgement,” Hoyer said.
By Smokey Go To Postthey said that hoe shit again?
That Hoyer shit.
If they try for impeachment now, without the un-redacted report and Mueller testimony, they will be inviting disaster in 2020. If this is a motivation game, there's no better way to motivate the right than to try and impeach their boy over shit they all think is a non starter. So it would be months before they even have the ammo they should have to try and impeach. Nadler will have to go to court to get the unredacted report.
So it's a matter of electoral strategy weighed against moral obligation to fulfill constitutional duties. I personally think they should try and impeach, but I don't really have an issue with voting his as out and focusing on that.
He's not in any legal or political jeopardy with this congressional make up and Barr as his stooge. If he's voted out, he still faces the SDNY shit and the EDVA shit among state charges in NY.
So it's a matter of electoral strategy weighed against moral obligation to fulfill constitutional duties. I personally think they should try and impeach, but I don't really have an issue with voting his as out and focusing on that.
He's not in any legal or political jeopardy with this congressional make up and Barr as his stooge. If he's voted out, he still faces the SDNY shit and the EDVA shit among state charges in NY.
By Fenderputty Go To PostIf they try for impeachment now, without the un-redacted report and Mueller testimony, they will be inviting disaster in 2020. If this is a motivation game, there's no better way to motivate the right than to try and impeach their boy over shit they all think is a non starter. So it would be months before they even have the ammo they should have to try and impeach. Nadler will have to go to court to get the unredacted report.
So it's a matter of electoral strategy weighed against moral obligation to fulfill constitutional duties. I personally think they should try and impeach, but I don't really have an issue with voting his as out and focusing on that.
He's not in any legal or political jeopardy with this congressional make up and Barr as his stooge. If he's voted out, he still faces the SDNY shit and the EDVA shit among state charges in NY.
All Hoyer had to say was "We received the report just today, and not the complete, unredacted version of it. As we are still reviewing the contents, it would be premature to make any statement regarding impeachment at this time."
Don't say shit about an election 18 months from now (an election that this level of bitchass-ness may very well lose.)
By Pac-12 Go To PostAll Hoyer had to say was "We received the report just today, and not the complete, unredacted version of it. As we are still reviewing the contents, it would be premature to make any statement regarding impeachment at this time."
Don't say shit about an election 18 months from now (an election that this level of bitchass-ness may very well lose.)
Leave wiggle room for impeachment talk it's all you're going to hear about from the right for the next 1.5 years. Dems have been soft on impeachment so far and it's still a drum that gets beat. There's a reason Barr is playing hide the weeny and not providing congress with a full report. Gives Trump the time to weather the storm until 2020 and hope for a win. The right is already conflating conspiracy with collusion and they're all eating it up.
Eh. Too much emphasis on the presidency anyway. Go national. Win state seats. Win districts. Trump can’t do anything if you control everything else. He’s fucked the second he’s out of office.