When the person sharing these clips also works for Tesla, things are even more complicated. John Bernal, a former Tesla employee who reviewed the company’s FSD Beta software on his YouTube channel AI Addict says he was fired by the company last month after posting a video that showed his Tesla hitting a bollard.
CNBC says Tesla’s social media policy for employees does not forbid criticism of the company’s products in public, but notes that the company “relies on the common sense and good judgment of its employees to engage in responsible social media activity.” Bernal says that after being fired, his access to the FSD Beta software was revoked.Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia
So the FSD reviews on YT have been from an employee all along, sheeeesh
can't risk getting banned on your best tool for market manipulation. gonna make that money back on the next pump&dump.
There has to be reasonable limits with free speech™ because when you think about it, there's no difference between showing people how sketchy autopilot is and shouting fire in a movie theatre.
By Pedja Go To PostThere has to be reasonable limits with free speech™ because when you think about it, there's no difference between showing people how sketchy autopilot is and shouting fire in a movie theatre.
Both are protected under 1A tho.
But what about the harm caused horse? Shouting fire can cause panic and distress among the plebs which is fine but imagine how distressed the Tesla shareholders would be about the autopilot FAKE NEWS.
Apparently as part of the deal for his share purchase and being on the board, he is not allowed to purchase a majority of shares in the company.
"has to act in the best interests of the company and all our shareholders"
he clearly thinks himself above this so not really shocked when it doesn't work out
he clearly thinks himself above this so not really shocked when it doesn't work out
He immediately spent time talking shit about twitter and calling it a dying platform. He's not gonna be on the board to be a "silent" anything cause the board told him he won't have the input he's seeking.
I bet the board presented him with a code of ethics and his "freedom of speech" libertarian ass recoiled. If anything he wants twitter to be less censored/moderated.
By reilo Go To PostI bet the board presented him with a code of ethics and his "freedom of speech" libertarian ass recoiled. If anything he wants twitter to be less censored/moderated.I mean you say that but there are ways to enact his influence without fiduciary liability. I imagine the board prefers that as well.
By Lunatic Go To PostI mean you say that but there are ways to enact his influence without fiduciary liability. I imagine the board prefers that as well.
Bro come on
By reilo Go To Posthttps://twitter.com/mikeisaac/status/1513373796035555330?s=21&t=zDK-yuyVlLc1a7O5zQoJ-AI have no doubt that Elon with his rabid fans will inflate twitters market cap. I get that it doesn't make sense purely on the fundamentals but this guy has proven that he is an act of god.
Bro come on
By DY_nasty Go To Post"To the Stars through Blood"
By reilo Go To PostThis list is all celebrities, former US president, and the PM of India
Bro come on
They removed his board seat because of the dozens and dozens of law suits coming for him/Twitter for not disclosing the purchase deal ahead of time. It's really as simple as that. He couldn't take it of course so he went on a rant, as he would.
https://www.businessinsider.com/tesla-model-x-return-policy-dispute-still-paying-danny-roman-2022-4?amp
Lmao. Brainworms
Despite the long tussle over his Model X, Roman told CNBC he's still a "huge believer in Tesla, Elon Musk and electric cars," adding: "I hope my story reaches the powers that be at Tesla and they make necessary changes so this does not happen to their future clients."
Lmao. Brainworms
Protocol correspondent Issie Lapowsky flagged a recently fav’d tweet from Musk saying, “Elon became largest shareholder for Free Speech… Elon was told to play nice and not speak freely.”like I said lol
By DiPro Go To Postlove me some good ol pump & dump.
“I would need to reconsider my position as shareholder,” says Musk if his offer is not accepted.
Twitter shares are up over 13 percent pre-market on the news.Yup
"Only I can fix Twitter" basically.
No better way to own the tool to pump TSLA stocks and ensure he never gets cancelled. It's insane how cheap Twitter is all things considering, the stock has not performed well at all. Many activist share holders tried to take control but failed, let's see if Elon can do it.
I didn't think he was $40-50b liquid rich, sheesh.
$41.3b for Twitter is very, very cheap.
No better way to own the tool to pump TSLA stocks and ensure he never gets cancelled. It's insane how cheap Twitter is all things considering, the stock has not performed well at all. Many activist share holders tried to take control but failed, let's see if Elon can do it.
I didn't think he was $40-50b liquid rich, sheesh.
$41.3b for Twitter is very, very cheap.
He's not, he'd borrow it seems like: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/04/14/business/elon-musk-twitter
Lol. everyone knows Twitter is overvalued. If they reject his offer, the SP will tank, at which point it's a firesale for Elon to buy majority stake at a fraction of current SP.
By Kabro Go To PostLol. everyone knows Twitter is overvalued. If they reject his offer, the SP will tank, at which point it's a firesale for Elon to buy majority stake at a fraction of current SP.Actually if anything Twitter is undervalued due to board incompetence. How can FB, Google, Microsoft and other big tech go 3*-5* while twitter stagnates? They've barely added new features, how can an edit function take this long to implement?
There is huge room for growth, twitter should be trading just above $70 as a start today.
By Kabro Go To PostLol. everyone knows Twitter is overvalued. If they reject his offer, the SP will tank, at which point it's a firesale for Elon to buy majority stake at a fraction of current SP.
They’re rejecting lol
By Frustrated_me Go To PostActually if anything Twitter is undervalued due to board incompetence. How can FB, Google, Microsoft and other big tech go 3*-5* while twitter stagnates? They've barely added new features, how can an edit function take this long to implement?$70? really?
There is huge room for growth, twitter should be trading just above $70 as a start today.
twitter missed their Q4 revenue expectations. Q1 2022 projections is lower than analysts expectations.
most analysts has a hold or sell with only a few being a buy rating.
there's thousands of stocks that should be trading higher based off revenues, but forward thinking perception, company guidance, market condition play a bigger role than what the company is generating in revenue.
By Kabro Go To Post$70? really?Right, and that's all due to a really bad board. Hence why I said if anything Twitter is underperforming, it's not well managed, no new ideas, no monetization, nada.
twitter missed their Q4 revenue expectations. Q1 2022 projections is lower than analysts expectations.
most analysts has a hold or sell with only a few being a buy rating.
there's thousands of stocks that should be trading higher based off revenues, but forward thinking perception, company guidance, market condition play a bigger role than what the company is generating in revenue.
How is it that in 2022 Twitter hasn't introduced a subscription model? I would be furious if I owned Twitter stocks. This board is just not good enough.
Even $70 is low for Twitter. It's the defacto town hall, it's what controls common narrative, it's the source of all media and news, it's the mecca of the internet.
“So that’s like having a gun to your child’s head,” Musk added. “So I was forced to concede to the SEC unlawfully. Those bastards.”???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
SEC needs to grow some balls and stick it to Tesla and Elon, but they're so toothless, won't do shit but slap meaningless fines.
By Frustrated_me Go To PostRight, and that's all due to a really bad board. Hence why I said if anything Twitter is underperforming, it's not well managed, no new ideas, no monetization, nada.
How is it that in 2022 Twitter hasn't introduced a subscription model? I would be furious if I owned Twitter stocks. This board is just not good enough.
Even $70 is low for Twitter. It's the defacto town hall, it's what controls common narrative, it's the source of all media and news, it's the mecca of the internet.
They have a subscription model.