By reilo Go To PostJust wait til you find out that Tesla would be losing money without the ability to sell EV creditswow way to completely dismiss their lucrative business of selling Bitcoin
By diehard Go To Postwow way to completely dismiss their lucrative business of selling BitcoinI'm hating. I too would like to sell made up things to car manufacturers that don't meet said made up standard for money.
The thing is, the big boys already said they won't need to buy EV credits from Tesla anymore starting this year and next so good luck hitting those margins.
Read the full thread of this guy. I can't decide anymore if this is an obvious troll or if people are like that in 2021.
Bork
I sold a few games on eBay and bought some dogs
The dogs will fund my retirement
I know it’ll crash and burn but these games did spike up randomly so let’s be dumb with money 😎
I sold a few games on eBay and bought some dogs
The dogs will fund my retirement
I know it’ll crash and burn but these games did spike up randomly so let’s be dumb with money 😎
You'd be better off buying a coin which hasn't been pumped to oblivion yet.
I only see loss in your future.
I only see loss in your future.
By LabouredPatriot Go To Post#Pray4Furyous
*100 emoji* Hurry and get to $1.50 doge so I can quit.
Minutes before liftoff, Elon Musk’s SpaceX ignored at least two warnings from the Federal Aviation Administration that launching its first high-altitude Starship prototype last December would violate the company’s launch license, confidential documents and letters obtained by The Verge show. And while SpaceX was under investigation, it told the FAA that the agency’s software was a “source of frustration” that has been “shown to be inaccurate at times or overly conservative,” according to the documents.https://www.theverge.com/2021/6/15/22352366/elon-musk-spacex-faa-warnings-starship-sn8-launch-violation-texas
"“SpaceX used analytical methods that appeared to be hastily developed to meet a launch window.”"
SpaceX’s violation of its launch license was “inconsistent with a strong safety culture,” the FAA’s space division chief Wayne Monteith said in a letter to SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell. “Although the report states that all SpaceX parties believed that such risk was sufficiently low to comply with regulatory criteria, SpaceX used analytical methods that appeared to be hastily developed to meet a launch window,” Monteith went on.
A Musk company violating federal safety guidelines? My I would never have imagined
"“SpaceX used analytical methods that appeared to be hastily developed to meet a launch window.”"
And in the context of a bunch of trillionaires having a
By DY_nasty Go To PostNever thought I'd believe Elon Musk over the FAA but it's been a crazy yearI still don't
Just make sure you are not at home when a piece of rocket falls in your back yard and enjoy that sweet cash settlement m8s
By DY_nasty Go To PostNever thought I'd believe Elon Musk over the FAA but it's been a crazy yeardy the only person to be surprised that dy believes Musk over the FAA
By Pedja Go To Postdy the only person who to be surprised that dy believes Musk over the FAAlol
By JesalR Go To PostMove fast and break things was the worst thing a nerd said in the last few decadesThat shit is fine when it's software that can be fixed on-the-fly but we are legit talking about now automotive and flight that has a human safety component to it. It's dumb. Zero oversight.
By reilo Go To PostThat shit is fine when it's software that can be fixed on-the-fly but we are legit talking about now automotive and flight that has a human safety component to it. It's dumb. Zero oversight.I disagree, because the software it was the motto for has done uncountable social harm.
It's more about the original intent of the philosophy was to just move into a process of reiteration as much as possible which is fine in software when you're making something dumb like a photo filter app.
But that shouldn't apply to making transportation vehicles that require user input and can be used as a deadly object.
But that shouldn't apply to making transportation vehicles that require user input and can be used as a deadly object.
I've always read it more in the vein of "forgiveness is easier than permission", especially given how robot lizard Zuck has acted his entire career.
I've always read it in a find-ways-of-unconventionally-but-quickly-skirting-around-regulation-to-succeed kind of way that entrepreneurs and/or techno-libertarians like to extol.
I really wish the FAA caught the scrutiny that FEMA does lol
a solid 10 years behind the curve on stuff like drones and largely look the other way with small aircraft whenever convenient but let me tell you about your space program. ight
a solid 10 years behind the curve on stuff like drones and largely look the other way with small aircraft whenever convenient but let me tell you about your space program. ight
this weekend i was walking by some stand with guys handing out tesla flyers offering free test drives with any tesla model. i found out they aren't associated with tesla at all but are in some sort of tesla owner club. they just really like the product and promote it for free on the weekends. this shit is a cult.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk is finally admitting that he underestimated how difficult it is to develop a safe and reliable self-driving car. To which the entire engineering community rose up as one to say, “No duh.”
Or at least that’s how it should have happened in a just world. Instead, all the Tesla sycophants and ass-kissers on Twitter told Musk to keep up the good work, that they believed in him, and encouraged him to hurry up and roll out the latest version of his “Full Self-Driving” software that, it’s worth pointing out, does not enable a Tesla vehicle to drive itself without input from the driver.
An anonymous Twitter user who uses the handle @greentheonly to post “hacks” of Tesla’s Autopilot, recreated the scenario to demonstrate how the company’s driver assist feature struggles with these sharp turns. With an overlay of Tesla’s Autopilot display running in the corner of the screen, greentheonly shows how the vehicle “actually outputs various alerts before the eventual ‘take over we are giving up.’” Other times, the car actually slows down enough and manages to take the turn safely.
A system that fails to take a sharp turn in “half the cases” should not inspire a great amount of confidence! Quite the opposite actually. The number of open investigations into vehicle crashes involving Tesla Autopilot seems to be growing in inverse relation to customer expectations about Musk’s ability to deliver on the promises he’s been making (and breaking) for years now.https://www.theverge.com/2021/7/5/22563751/tesla-elon-musk-full-self-driving-admission-autopilot-crash
The Verge not holding back lol
Musk’s ability to deliver on the promises he’s been making (and breaking) for years now.So much for Mars for Dy.
By Lupercal Go To PostA few thousand dollars in traveler's cheques and a few million in a trust fund seems more apt.is there a legit source on this? i've heard conflicting reports on how wealthy his parents were.
