Pediatricians say Florida hurt sick kids to help big GOP donors
- Page 1 of 1
With her son in terrible pain, Meredith Stroud arranged for surgeries to fix his problems.
But just days before the procedures were to take place, the surgeons' office called to cancel them.
Like nearly half of all children in Florida, LJ is on Medicaid, which has several types of insurance plans. The state had switched LJ to a new plan, and his surgeons didn't take it.
LJ filed a lawsuit against the state of Florida, and he was eventually placed back on Children's Medical Services and received the care he needed. But some Florida
pediatricians worry about other children with special health care needs who, two years later, are still off the program.
The doctors aren't just worried; they're angry.
First, the data analysis the state used to justify switching the children is "inaccurate" and "bizarre," according to the researcher who wrote the software used in that analysis.
Finally, parents and Florida pediatricians raise questions about the true reasons why Florida's Republican administration switched the children's health plans. They question whether it was to financially reward insurance companies that had donated millions of dollars to the Republican Party of Florida.
"This was a way for the politicians to repay the entities that had contributed to their political campaigns and their political success, and it's the children who suffered," said Dr. Louis St. Petery, former executive vice president of the Florida chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
Experts outside Florida are also disturbed that the children were switched out of CMS, a program that's served as a model for other states for more than 40 years.
"CMS is well-known and well-respected," said Dr. James Perrin, professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. "It's one of the earlier programs to build in assurances that these kids get the kind of care they need."
Experts agree with her.http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/18/health/florida-sick-kids-insurance-eprise/index.html
"I personally find it pretty astonishing that they can take a survey question like that and use it to justify the de-enrolling of these kids," said Dr. Jay Berry, an assistant professor of pediatrics at Harvard Medical School who studies policies for children with special health care needs.
What Florida did was "completely invalid," added Dr. John Neff, professor emeritus of pediatrics at the University of Washington, another expert on children with special health care needs.
The pediatricians explained that many children with serious and chronic medical conditions – such as cleft lip and palate, HIV, diabetes and cystic fibrosis – are often able to do things other children can do. However, they still require extensive and highly specialized medical care.
And the money paragraphs:
Switching the children from CMS to the other Medicaid plans didn't save taxpayers money, according to McManus, the agency spokeswoman.
The doctors wonder, then, whether the inspiration for the change was political: to send taxpayers' dollars to generous donors to the Florida Republican Party.
CMS is a public program; it's not owned by a private insurance company.
When the children were taken off CMS, they were switched to 11 insurance plans that are owned by private companies. The parent companies of nine of those 11 plans donated a total of more than $8 million to Florida Republican Party committees in the five years before the children were switched.
Health insurance will never be truly fixed in our country until it is completely decoupled from the profit motive.
By KingGondo Go To PostHealth insurance will never be truly fixed in our country until it is completely decoupled from the profit motive.
You are aware private insurers with profit motive exist in Universal Healthcare systems in Europe, correct?
Also ... none of that should surprise anyone. They voted this man in for a second term
http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2014/mar/03/florida-democratic-party/rick-scott-rick-scott-oversaw-largest-medicare-fra/
http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2014/mar/03/florida-democratic-party/rick-scott-rick-scott-oversaw-largest-medicare-fra/
By Fenderputty Go To PostYou are aware private insurers with profit motive exist in Universal Healthcare systems in Europe, correct?Yes
By KingGondo Go To PostYes
Why would it work there and not here?
He said profit oriented, not private. Does Europe have for profit insurance? There's a difference to explore.
As long as everyone is guaranteed a quality level of care, I don't have a problem with private insurance existing alongside that framework. But it should be supplementary to universal healthcare and it should be heavily regulated.
If some private insurer wants to offer Cadillac plans to rich people, fine. But that's assuming that everyone else is covered already.
If some private insurer wants to offer Cadillac plans to rich people, fine. But that's assuming that everyone else is covered already.
By reilo Go To PostHe said profit oriented, not private. Does Europe have for profit insurance? There's a difference to explore.
Sweeden. It's not supplemental and it's universal. Its publicly funded. There's cost controls. It would be the easiest model for us to transition into. By far. The infrastructure we already have is set up for their system. Universal healthcare doesn't need to The UK's system.
There's a public option too by the way. But private insurance accounts for about 1/3 of primary care.
It's just that you don't need to remove profit motive, but rather cap it
By Kibner Go To PostSo like how gasoline profits are regulated.
Sweeden has a central system that funds things via taxation. It's broken up into smaller areas. Each county area is in charge is providing the public option and set standards for that areas service. It's also controls and regulates the private insurers. Public money is only refunded if the private insurer is approved in the county area. On top of that they cap profit.