By NinjaFridge Go To Postlmao
By data Go To PostFrom the same threadSmokey on eBay already
If you don't wanna user Mixer, the Xbox website says it'll be up on YouTube as well: http://www.youtube.com/xbox
By livefromkyoto Go To PostI already have two jobs :(
Xbox Scorpio: $759.05
Elite Controller: $214.69
One game: $90.39
XBL Gold: $79.09
Total to play one game: $1143.22
This is on some Neo Geo shit.
XB1 launched for $900 CAD / $670 USD here.
(but we earn more on avg. so i still feel your pain)
By LFMartins86 Go To PostLinks for the Microsoft conference will be in the OP as soon as I finish my dinner.Our new mod's priorities, lads
Disgrace
By Bold 2 in One Go To PostI raise you
Look like a cult meeting
The fake outrage at $499 is hilarious. Not one poster in here besides Rodeo was going to buy one anyway, but now y'all act like it was even an option in the first place for you Sony apologists
I was thinking of buying the Scorpio this holiday season and passing on the PS4 pro.
That's not happening now
That's not happening now
I bought a PS3 at $599 (which honestly, was probably a good thing since it's backwards compatible). I'm not against Scorpio at $499, but that's a lot of money if all you have to launch with is Crackdown and State of Decay.
By Smokey Go To PostThe fake outrage at $499 is hilarious. Not one poster in here besides Rodeo was going to buy one anyway, but now y'all act like it was even an option in the first place for you Sony apologistsAll in. ROFL
By Smokey Go To PostThe fake outrage at $499 is hilarious. Not one poster in here besides Rodeo was going to buy one anyway, but now y'all act like it was even an option in the first place for you Sony apologistsThat's definitely me. But they're not giving anyone a reason to buy it. The price is just insult to injury. I do believe the 360 support is something that Sony is going to fake like they don't care about but will try and include down the line in either the 4 or definitely the PS5.
This persona you've created here has been entertaining leading up to today though.
By HasphatsAnts Go To PostI was thinking of buying the Scorpio this holiday season and passing on the PS4 pro.At least wait until the conference is over. Damn. lol
That's not happening now
By Auto Simeone Go To Postannounce Halo on PC damnitHow many Halo's do you need?
By Smokey Go To PostThe fake outrage at $499 is hilarious. Not one poster in here besides Rodeo was going to buy one anyway, but now y'all act like it was even an option in the first place for you Sony apologists
The only Sony apologetics I do is for the Vita. My interest was definitely piqued by the Scorpio initially, and if I were at a different point in my life I might not be so hung up on the price. But as it is they'd need to come out with a Dreamcast-tier lineup of creative games to justify that kind of buy-in cost.
By Auto Simeone Go To Postannounce Halo on PC damnitYou'll get Halo 6. They're not going to touch anything Master Chief Collection related by this point.
I also don't see anyone defending the first half of PS3's life. That was a disaster.
But they rectified it in a few ways:
1) Aggressively price reduced it in a short amount of years
2) New IPs and investments all over
3) Didn't make the same mistake with the PS4
But they rectified it in a few ways:
1) Aggressively price reduced it in a short amount of years
2) New IPs and investments all over
3) Didn't make the same mistake with the PS4
I dislike most of Sony's beloved first party games. My choice of console comes down solely to which one does it better of stuff that's not on PC. Library-wise, I consider 360 one of the GOATs.
MS is fucked until next gen and this just seems like wasting even more money. Phil will be gone when this thing flops and they'll stick someone else in there or the Xbox brand will be dead by next gen.
MS is fucked until next gen and this just seems like wasting even more money. Phil will be gone when this thing flops and they'll stick someone else in there or the Xbox brand will be dead by next gen.
By rodeoclown Go To PostThey're not going to touch anything Master Chief Collection related by this point.Speaking of which, how did they fuck up something as easy as that? It's hilarious. That was such an easy cash-cow that people were doing backflips over to hand them their money, and they dropped the ball hard.
I bought a PS3 at 599€ but that was with 2 controllers and 3 games. And it still felt like a lot.
Imagine paying 499€ for just a console.
Imagine paying 499€ for just a console.
By rodeoclown Go To PostYou'll get Halo 6. They're not going to touch anything Master Chief Collection related by this point.mcc on pc incoming
By GQman2121 Go To PostI do believe the 360 support is something that Sony is going to fake like they don't care about but will try and include down the line in either the 4 or definitely the PS5.
No, Sony not caring is going to be genuine. Xbox owners don't play 360 games, it's largely a waste of time for Microsoft that only serves as a marketing bullet point for forum warz.
Ars Technica - Xbox One users largely ignore backward-compatible Xbox 360 games
By reilo Go To PostSpeaking of which, how did they fuck up something as easy as that? It's hilarious. That was such an easy cash-cow that people were doing backflips over to hand them their money, and they dropped the ball hard.They took for granted that the multiplayer will work as intended, when the architecture is different from Xbox 360's.
I think the same happened with Driveclub. They underestimated the work needed to be done on the online architecture, especially when users can have a few hundred friends compared to the PS3. Destroyed that company completely.
By reilo Go To PostSpeaking of which, how did they fuck up something as easy as that? It's hilarious. That was such an easy cash-cow that people were doing backflips over to hand them their money, and they dropped the ball hard.It does too much and matchmaking across four different games is really hard, but somehow these problems never came up in testing? It should have just been Halo 2 Anniversary complete with multiplayer.
By ReRixo Go To Postmcc on pc incomingThat thing still does not work well on Xbox and they gave up on patching it after it got kinda, sorta playable. I'd be shocked.
By livefromkyoto Go To PostNo, Sony not caring is going to be genuine. Xbox owners don't play 360 games, it's largely a waste of time for Microsoft that only serves as a marketing bullet point for forum warz.
Ars Technica - Xbox One users largely ignore backward-compatible Xbox 360 games
[Update: Further information from Microsoft has led us to correct and amend significant portions of the analysis in this piece related to undercounting of usage data. Please read our full explanation of these corrections.]
By reilo Go To Post$499.
No games.
Bias, he says.
No games is literally a trollish comment and one that is repeated all the time in Sonyland aka GAF. You're projecting the same behavior on your own forum
By livefromkyoto Go To PostNo, Sony not caring is going to be genuine. Xbox owners don't play 360 games, it's largely a waste of time for Microsoft that only serves as a marketing bullet point for forum warz.
Ars Technica - Xbox One users largely ignore backward-compatible Xbox 360 games
You're spreading fake news
People frothing at the mouth over a difference of 100$, in an age where yearly phone upgrades are 400-800$, never ceases to amaze me.
By FlutterPuffs Go To Post
There's also evidence that interest in backward compatibility use has picked up in recent months, after our sample concluded. Back in November (right in the middle of our sample), Microsoft said Xbox One owners had only put 210 million hours into backward compatible games. Assuming about 25 million Xbox One owners at the time, that translates to about 0.7 hours per owner per month, or 3.15 hours in a 4.5 month period.
The addition of Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 to the backward compatibile lineup in April (after our sample) would go a long way to explain that increase in total and average usage (That launch also helps explain Phil Spencer's tweeted statement that "one or two BC games [appear] in our daily top played games.") The July addition of Red Dead Redemption to backward compatibility could have also caused a brief surge in interest in the feature that largely predated our sample. Overall, it's hard to say how our 4.5 month chunk of usage might line up with 18 months of what could be temporary spikes in backward compatible interest.
Wow, 3 hours in 4.5months. Megaton.
By Smokey Go To PostNo games is literally a trollish comment and one that is repeated all the time in Sonyland aka GAF. You're projecting the same behavior on your own forumYou stan Ryse, your opinions are invalid.
By Zabojnik Go To PostPeople frothing at the mouth over a difference of 100$, in an age where yearly phone upgrades are 400-800$, never ceases to amaze me.
By Smokey Go To PostThe fake outrage at $499 is hilarious. Not one poster in here besides Rodeo was going to buy one anyway, but now y'all act like it was even an option in the first place for you Sony apologists
It's 100% #FakeOutrage
By reilo Go To PostYou stan Ryse, your opinions are invalid.
Uh huh
I love sports. It consumes an embarrassing amount of my life.
I also love games.
I cannot see or understand the appeal at all of these ultimate team modes that now dictate how all sports games are planned and developed.
I also love games.
I cannot see or understand the appeal at all of these ultimate team modes that now dictate how all sports games are planned and developed.
By Smokey Go To PostThe fake outrage at $499 is hilarious. Not one poster in here besides Rodeo was going to buy one anyway, but now y'all act like it was even an option in the first place for you Sony apologists
i own a xbox one and i had this preordered but dropping almost 700 bucks on this with that stupid name and jaguar...
I'm just in it for the melt downs. We all know real gamers buy counter strike skins for their money.
