By jjasper Go To PostI mean what do you want him to say "Yeah we did this with PC and tried to get MS to do it when we had a small userbase to try and build up player numbers for our MP games but they said nah. Now we have a large userbase and they are asking us and we are like nah fuck you phil"
Yeah?
Think of the fuking children is one of the sorriest pr answers I've seen. Since when does Sony care about children , so what , Nintendo doesn't now lol. Even the interview sitting there rolling his eyes at the bs.
He should've left it at we made a commercial decision that we may take a look at some time down the road, but right now we're content with our decision.
Boom. Done.
Think of the children from SONY is lol
Lot's of hand wringing over something that doesn't matter in the slightest.
Want to know how the complainers can make their stance known? go ahead and sell/trade in your PS4 for a Switch or Xbox. Then they'll really be showing Sony where they stand.
Want to know how the complainers can make their stance known? go ahead and sell/trade in your PS4 for a Switch or Xbox. Then they'll really be showing Sony where they stand.
By Smokey Go To PostYeah?Its a nicer way of saying
Think of the fuking children is one of the sorriest pr answers I've seen. Since when does Sony care about children , so what , Nintendo doesn't now lol. Even the interview sitting there rolling his eyes at the bs.
Think of the potential lawsuits
While some executives lie in the fetal position having PTSD over the PSN hacks
If Nintendo isn't saying think about the children Sony has no business saying it.
Think of the children but here's God of War where you rip peoples heads off and dismember them, or here's The Last of Us Lite.
Think of the children but here's God of War where you rip peoples heads off and dismember them, or here's The Last of Us Lite.
By RATHasReturned Go To PostLot's of hand wringing over something that doesn't matter in the slightest.
Want to know how the complainers can make their stance known? go ahead and sell/trade in your PS4 for a Switch or Xbox. Then they'll really be showing Sony where they stand.
Sony can do no wrong in your eyes. It's a terrible excuse. Literally better off with a no comment.
Sony has never thought of the kids when it comes to gaming content. Like ever.
By Smokey Go To PostSony can do no wrong in your eyes. It's a terrible excuse. Literally better off with a no comment.For your sake and the rest of them, I hope they put their money where their mouth is. Lots of people complain on the Internet. Talk is cheap. Act!
Sony has never thought of the kids when it comes to gaming content. Like ever.
By RATHasReturned Go To PostFor your sake and the rest of them, I hope they put their money where their mouth is. Lots of people complain on the Internet. Talk is cheap. Act!
For my sake ? Don't know what you're getting at . It's ok to call Sony out for a dumb response to a question. We all know the reason. Say it or no comment. Don't blame the children lol.
Spider-man on Sony just now and apparently that section with the crane last night can be played a number of different ways while chasing down the chopper off the roof.
So the crane comes down and you do the QTEs blah, blah, blah, but then you pursue anyway you want before triggering the next set of QTEs. They seem to want to stress the open world to clarify concerns for some reason.
Need to see more.
So the crane comes down and you do the QTEs blah, blah, blah, but then you pursue anyway you want before triggering the next set of QTEs. They seem to want to stress the open world to clarify concerns for some reason.
Need to see more.
By Smokey Go To PostFor my sake ? Don't know what you're getting at . It's ok to call Sony out for a dumb response to a question. We all know the reason. Say it or no comment. Don't blame the children lol.The response that they're protecting children is a dumb excuse. I didn't know you literally needed me to spell that out for you.
My point is a bigger one than this. If you and the rest of the people think this is a bad policy, do something that affects their bottom line. YOU are already in the tank for MS. The rest of them who are complaining about not being able to play against MS or Nintendo fan should go buy those consoles and/or buy the games on those platforms. When Sony see's that their 3rd party "cross-platform-play" games are selling worse, then they'll have business decisions to think otherwise.
By GQman2121 Go To PostSpider-man on Sony just now and apparently that section with the crane last night can be played a number of different ways while chasing down the chopper off the roof.
So the crane comes down and you do the QTEs blah, blah, blah, but then you purse anyway you want before triggering the next set of QTEs. They seem to want to stress the open world to clarify concerns for some reason.
Need to see more.
It did look good. Have they shown free roam swinging?
By Smokey Go To PostIt did look good. Have they shown free roam swinging?No. Not outside of that chopper segment. That's why I'm saying we need to see more and see how much of the island is being rendered and is accessible.
By RATHasReturned Go To PostThe response that they're protecting children is a dumb excuse. I didn't know you literally needed me to spell that out for you.
My point is a bigger one than this. If you and the rest of the people think this is a bad policy, do something that affects their bottom line. YOU are already in the tank for MS. The rest of them who are complaining about not being able to play against MS or Nintendo fan should go buy those consoles and/or buy the games on those platforms. When Sony see's that their 3rd party "cross-platform-play" games are selling worse, then they'll have business decisions to think otherwise.
Yes yes ,we know. Vote with your wallet etc. I'm not in the tank for anybody. I've the ability to reach every thing save Nintendo, which will be fixed with Mario.
Its a silly comment and should be exposed as such.
By Smokey Go To PostYeah?
Think of the fuking children is one of the sorriest pr answers I've seen. Since when does Sony care about children , so what , Nintendo doesn't now lol. Even the interview sitting there rolling his eyes at the bs.
He should've left it at we made a commercial decision that we may take a look at some time down the road, but right now we're content with our decision.
Boom. Done.
Think of the children from SONY is lol
I mean, you're not wrong, but you say this as if it wouldn't land even worse. They're talking to a bunch of people who are getting angry about not being able to play Minecraft with Billy down the block to begin with. Mature business rationale isn't going to score them any more points.
By RATHasReturned Go To PostLot's of hand wringing over something that doesn't matter in the slightest.
Want to know how the complainers can make their stance known? go ahead and sell/trade in your PS4 for a Switch or Xbox. Then they'll really be showing Sony where they stand.
Except the whole reason they're not doing this in the first place is because people have been trading in their Xboxes so they actually have someone to play Destiny with.
By RATHasReturned Go To PostThe response that they're protecting children is a dumb excuse. I didn't know you literally needed me to spell that out for you.people aren't going to switch consoles mid/late gen to crossplay a few titles.
My point is a bigger one than this. If you and the rest of the people think this is a bad policy, do something that affects their bottom line. YOU are already in the tank for MS. The rest of them who are complaining about not being able to play against MS or Nintendo fan should go buy those consoles and/or buy the games on those platforms. When Sony see's that their 3rd party "cross-platform-play" games are selling worse, then they'll have business decisions to think otherwise.
By data Go To PostFire Emblem Warriors looks like Hyrule Warriors mediocrity
please deliver DW9 onto me, Keoi
But flipping horses tho
I want to know what's the end game for the people complaining is?
"I can't play Minecraft/Rocket League with Billy down the block because Sony won't let me."
"Therefore I will [blank]."
What's the [blank]?
"I can't play Minecraft/Rocket League with Billy down the block because Sony won't let me."
"Therefore I will [blank]."
What's the [blank]?
By RATHasReturned Go To PostWhat's the [blank]?"Therefore I will keep wasting my money on a console that lacks games."
By RATHasReturned Go To PostI want to know what's the end game for the people complaining is?
"I can't play Minecraft/Rocket League with Billy down the block because Sony won't let me."
"Therefore I will [blank]."
What's the [blank]?
So never complain/discuss about anything a corporation does again because in the grand scheme of things, it doesn't matter?
Well,ok
By s y Go To PostKind of weird seeing the Rabbids game with better Visuals than the mainline Mario title lol
Right? Why I asked if the A team was on Odyssey
Where's Mario Galaxy 3
By GQman2121 Go To PostSpider-man on Sony just now and apparently that section with the crane last night can be played a number of different ways while chasing down the chopper off the roof.Looks legit as fuck
So the crane comes down and you do the QTEs blah, blah, blah, but then you pursue anyway you want before triggering the next set of QTEs. They seem to want to stress the open world to clarify concerns for some reason.
Need to see more.
Cross-platform-play doesn't even register in my top ten reasons for being interested in a game. If we're talking PC, yes, that seems like a great additional feature. For a new system like the Switch from a company that just found out about online gaming two months ago, yes, again, another plus.
Xbox or PS though? It's nice to keep servers full of potential players, but it's definitely not make or break for either side.
Ryan's response was ridiculous, not because of its poor reasoning, but because it insults the intelligence of his customers. We all know why Sony is saying no to this: they know it's good business. There's very little benefit in helping someone who only owns a Switch or a PC to interact with a PS4. They want that person to ultimately buy a PS4.
Xbox or PS though? It's nice to keep servers full of potential players, but it's definitely not make or break for either side.
Ryan's response was ridiculous, not because of its poor reasoning, but because it insults the intelligence of his customers. We all know why Sony is saying no to this: they know it's good business. There's very little benefit in helping someone who only owns a Switch or a PC to interact with a PS4. They want that person to ultimately buy a PS4.
By GQman2121 Go To PostXbox or PS though? It's nice to keep servers full of potential players, but it's definitely not make or break for either side.
Ryan's response was ridiculous, not because of its poor reasoning, but because it insults the intelligence of his customers. We all know why Sony is saying no to this: they know it's good business. There's very little benefit in helping someone who only owns a Switch or a PC to interact with a PS4. They want that person to ultimately buy a PS4.
Yep
He had it right with "commercial decision". Somehow we end up with children when their E3 conference just showed dudes getting their brains blown out and a little kid ramming a knife through an enemys head.
By RATHasReturned Go To PostI want to know what's the end game for the people complaining is?Sometimes when people voice their complaints, it results in change.
"I can't play Minecraft/Rocket League with Billy down the block because Sony won't let me."
"Therefore I will [blank]."
What's the [blank]?
Forgot E3 was public this year. Crowds are pretty insane.
https://m.imgur.com/8uHWPyX
https://m.imgur.com/8uHWPyX
By GQman2121 Go To PostRyan's response was ridiculous, not because of its poor reasoning, but because it insults the intelligence of his customers. We all know why Sony is saying no to this: they know it's good business. There's very little benefit in helping someone who only owns a Switch or a PC to interact with a PS4. They want that person to ultimately buy a PS4.
Yet to some it isn't a problem when Spencer insults the intelligence of the customers by saying that the PS4 Pro is "competing" with the One S. Or acting like it is a full 4K console with a CPU from 2013. I get that people cheer for spunky underdogs but people eating up Spencer's bullshit is just weird.
By Hitch Go To PostIf Spiderman isn't structurally like Infamous 1 and 2, they've fucked itwhat?
Infamous is boring
I want a game like Spider-Man 2
By Hitch Go To PostIf Spiderman isn't structurally like Infamous 1 and 2, they've fucked it....wat?
By batong Go To PostNow this is something I didn't expect:Nintendo have been working close with Epic to make sure Unreal runs as best as possible in the Switch, won't be surprised if this happens more often in the future.
By LFMartins86 Go To PostNintendo have been working close with Epic to make sure Unreal runs as best as possible in the Switch, won't be surprised if this happens more often in the future.It's one thing to make it work on your system, another to actual use their engine for first party games. Nintendo usually use their own heavily customised engines.
By jjasper Go To PostYet to some it isn't a problem when Spencer insults the intelligence of the customers by saying that the PS4 Pro is "competing" with the One S. Or acting like it is a full 4K console with a CPU from 2013. I get that people cheer for spunky underdogs but I people eating up Spencer's bullshit. is just weird.We're not dealing or interacting with the sharpest tools in the shed online. They are tools though.
By batong Go To PostIt's one thing to make it work on your system, another to actual use their engine for first party games. Nintendo usually use their own heavily customised engines.Maybe they learned that if they can work with a popular middle-ware vendor to customize their engine for Nintendo's platform, it makes it easier for devs to make games on their system? And dogfooding it with their own games shows confidence and gives examples of what is possible with it.
Doubtful, but I can dream!
By jjasper Go To PostYet to some it isn't a problem when Spencer insults the intelligence of the customers by saying that the PS4 Pro is "competing" with the One S. Or acting like it is a full 4K console with a CPU from 2013. I get that people cheer for spunky underdogs but I people eating up Spencer's bullshit. is just weird.
Executives from competing companies say dumb shyt on the same day :shrug
By Hitch Go To PostIf Spiderman isn't structurally like Infamous 1 and 2, they've fucked itDo you mean 'moral choices'?
Cos that suits Spidey to a tee, lol
u crazy
Nintendo has really learned a lot from the shittastic Wii U launch. Sure things were eased a little because they delayed Zelda to the launch but then after that they had 2 competitive games planned for the Summer that will people will be playing for a while in arms and and Splatoon then have 2 Mario games out by the end of the year and then Xenoblade to lead into 2018 where they will have a Yoshi and Kirby game in the first half all the while sprinkling in Wii U ports that are new to most people cause no one owned a Wii U.
By s y Go To Post….wat?Just using Infamous because of its traversal mechanics. It needs to have a completely open city, and side missions that have actually been designed properly. I was gonna use Arkham City, but there's a lot of checklist bullshit objective design in Rocksteady's open world structure, something that the first 2 infamous games avoided aside from the shard collection iirc. If Spiderman 2 veers too close to that Ubisoft style of ticking boxes with an absolute plethora of collectibles, in lieu of proper content, it won't be anywhere near as good as it should be.
Basically I want it to be open world with cinematic main missions (hopefully where the abundance of QTEs lie), and avoid falling into the same trap that Second Son did
By rvy Go To PostSpongerman looks great. What a time.It's probably early game. Speed is probably upgradeable like Spiderman 2.
Better fix that slow ass web slinging tho