By Kabro Go To PostPops gonna lose his goat status real soonnah spurs will rebound next game.
By Kabro Go To PostPops gonna lose his goat status real soonIt's amazing he gets a team of 40 year olds this far.
By blackace Go To PostThe west lost to all of the teams I listed but that doesn't mean they werent better than the rest of the east..Im not gonna act like I know for sure cause for the most part I only followed the Knicks back then but that doesn't seem right. The Knicks Heat and pacers were good teams and teams like the Hawks and the Hornets were decent. Also I remember a lot of the really bad teams back then were in the west Clippers, Mavericks, Warriors, Grizzlies. Kibner check the numbers!
By diehard Go To Postmy hot take: this game isnt overyour most positive post this year.
By diehard Go To Postmy hot take: this game isnt overlmao
By diehard Go To Postmy hot take: this game isnt overyea theres still 12 more minutes
By reilo Go To PostSooooo about LamarcusThat's your boy tho
By Kabro Go To PostPops gonna lose his goat status real soonHot takes are sizzling in here tonight.
By DY_nasty Go To PostThat's your boy thoThe moment they leave they dead to me.
Exceptions: Sheed, Zbo
Hard to think of a player whose reputation has suffered more than LMA over the last couple of seasons. Melo is up there too.
By KingGondo Go To PostHard to think of a player whose reputation has suffered more than LMA over the last couple of seasons. Melo is up there too.Yeah, Crushed.
By Colonel Nasty Go To PostGood win, glad to see some 3s go down
Yep
By masud Go To PostIm not gonna act like I know for sure cause for the most part I only followed the Knicks back then but that doesn't seem right. The Knicks Heat and pacers were good teams and teams like the Hawks and the Hornets were decent. Also I remember a lot of the really bad teams back then were in the west Clippers, Mavericks, Warriors, Grizzlies. Kibner check the numbers!What numbers do you want?
90s were fairly close for 50+ win teams with the west having slightly more on average.. 00s were ugly for the east the west was doubling and sometimes tripling 50+ win teams..
By DY_nasty Go To Post-36 in 24 minutes lmaoIf I hadn't witnessed it, I would have a hard time believing it. Crazy.
By Jeff-DSA Go To PostIf I hadn't witnessed it, I would have a hard time believing it. Crazy.damn. lmao
I honestly hate the culture of antagonism that coaches/players have fostered in sports with the media.
I have nothing but respect for Pop but jesus that schtick is tired and old.
I have nothing but respect for Pop but jesus that schtick is tired and old.
By Jonm Go To PostI honestly hate the culture of antagonism that coaches/players have fostered in sports with the media.
I have nothing but respect for Pop but jesus that schtick is tired and old.
I think it's tough on both sides. But sometimes the media questions are targeted and stupid "How shit is LMA, are you going to play him tomorrow?"... yeah you go in on that guy.
I do dislike them going in on a "professional" question that just needs a token response though. Just unrpofessional, and everyone in the room will take that quote.
But I also recognize that it would be very difficult to care about people who have written hit pieces on you before.
By reilo Go To PostSooooo about Lamarcus
I didn't see the game but looking at the stats..... wow.....
wtf happened out there. Looking at the stats they just shot them out of the gym with 3 pointer, but how did Aldridge get shut out like that
By blackace Go To PostWhat numbers do you want?I was talking about the 90's that was the part of your statement i disagreed with. I agree with you about the 00's, that was my original point about things being better than they have been.
90s were fairly close for 50+ win teams with the west having slightly more on average.. 00s were ugly for the east the west was doubling and sometimes tripling 50+ win teams..
Also I dont think number of 50 win teams is a good indicator of anything. It could also be evidence of a top heavy conference, what were the head to head numbers?
By giririsss Go To PostI think it's tough on both sides. But sometimes the media questions are targeted and stupid "How shit is LMA, are you going to play him tomorrow?"… yeah you go in on that guy.
I do dislike them going in on a "professional" question that just needs a token response though. Just unrpofessional, and everyone in the room will take that quote.
But I also recognize that it would be very difficult to care about people who have written hit pieces on you before.
To an extent I sympathize. For instance I think it is a bit ridiculous the league forces the losers to come out and speak after losses moments after. It is very tabloid esque and never really provides any value except a meme or two a few times a season.
At the same time, this is your job and 90% of the time the other side acts professional. Even in wins you have these guys acting the same way. Ask them a detailed question and they will take the angle of not wanting to divulge strategy, being a dick to justify that.....Go the other direction and give them a broad question to allow a general platform so they can control the message and you get slapped for asking a "dumb" question.
I also say this with Cousins on my team, who I think did one of the most shameful acts toward the media I have seen.
By Smokey Go To Postwhere dy at? pulling a lamarcusHype over one second round game? Typical rockets fans
By masud Go To PostI was talking about the 90's that was the part of your statement i disagreed with. I agree with you about the 00's, that was my original point about things being better than they have been.50 wins is a very decent indicator how strong the conference is.. just look at last year.. both the west and the east were top heavy but the east only had 2 50 win teams while the west put out 4.. most good teams should win..
Also I dont think number of 50 win teams is a good indicator of anything. It could also be evidence of a top heavy conference, what were the head to head numbers?
looking at one because I am being kind of lazy so someone can knock up an average
http://www.basketball-reference.com/leagues/NBA_1992_standings.html?sr&utm_source=direct&utm_medium=Share&utm_campaign=ShareTool#expanded_standings
the east top 6 teams were above .500 against the west
While the west top 7 teams were above .500 against the east...
What'sts the difference between a 48 win team and a 50 win team?
Because the east had 4 of those teams last season.
Because the east had 4 of those teams last season.
By s y Go To PostWhat'sts the difference between a 48 win team and a 50 win team?Neat. The Southwest Division had FOUR 50-win teams in 2015 alone. The fifth team won 45 games.
Because the east had 4 of those teams last season.