Not sure whether this qualifies as TV or film, but Ken Burns' The Vietnam War is devastating already and I'm only in the first episode.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/08/arts/blade-runner-2049-ryan-gosling-harrison-ford-ridley-scott-denis-villeneuve.html?_r=0
SCOTT "I used to watch a lot of MTV, and I suddenly realized that, “Hang on. There’s a shot in there from ‘Blade Runner.’ ” It had sneaked out and was influencing filmmakers and rock ‘n’ roll artists. I got a call from Bob Dylan — he had a lawyer contact me, and I went in and I spent the whole evening with Bob Dylan because he adored “Blade Runner” so much. So I knew it had made its dent."
Bob Dylan loves Blade Runner.
SCOTT "I used to watch a lot of MTV, and I suddenly realized that, “Hang on. There’s a shot in there from ‘Blade Runner.’ ” It had sneaked out and was influencing filmmakers and rock ‘n’ roll artists. I got a call from Bob Dylan — he had a lawyer contact me, and I went in and I spent the whole evening with Bob Dylan because he adored “Blade Runner” so much. So I knew it had made its dent."
Bob Dylan loves Blade Runner.
Bob Dylan has made nothing but shit in the last 30 years. No surprise he likes a shit movie.
His opinion is worthless.
His opinion is worthless.
By s y Go To PostBob Dylan has made nothing but shit in the last 30 years. No surprise he likes a shit movie.
His opinion is worthless.
Time Out of Mind, Love and Theft, and Modern Times are all pretty good.
I also like Oh Mercy.
By s y Go To PostAll trash. Last good album by Dylan is Blood on the Tracks.
So hes been trash for over 40 years.
You are wrong, but you must be used to that by now.
By Wengward Go To PostYou are wrong, but you must be used to that by now.
By s y Go To PostBob Dylan has made nothing but shit in the last 30 years. No surprise he likes a shit movie.
His opinion is worthless.
This is a terrible opinion.
Time out of Mind. Love & Theft and Tempest are all quality. Oh Mercy underrated too.
Kingsman getting mixed to positive reviews. Didn't like the first one at all; thought its humour was smutty for the sake of being so with no charm or wit, the action too hyperactive. Egerton was good at least.
By s y Go To PostKingsman > Fury Road
when are you going to stop posting
So I saw "Mother!" earlier today....uhhhhhh it was interesting and definitely made me think about the film as a whole but I can also see why people hate it, it's definitely a divisive film. It is not his best film, but I admire its ambition and what Aronofsky was going for, and it's absolutely his vision put on there, warts and all.
Last 30 mins are pure insanity and shocking though. Madness, absolute madness.
No rating cos I want to think about what I saw today and let it sink in.
Last 30 mins are pure insanity and shocking though. Madness, absolute madness.
No rating cos I want to think about what I saw today and let it sink in.
By s y Go To PostKingsman > Fury RoadCorrect.
Also, I just got home from mother! I can't even put into words what I just watched. I'm happy that I saw it. I'm happy that someone, Aronofsky got to make such a thing, but yeah, this is one of those movies that I'll need to read A LOT about.
Psy's post is madness.
They're not even the same time of movie. You can't really compare the two unless you just say they're action films which is just a generic name for the entire genre.
They're not even the same time of movie. You can't really compare the two unless you just say they're action films which is just a generic name for the entire genre.
By Zabojnik Go To PostA Ghost Story was … something.
the word is beautiful
By LFMartins86 Go To PostThis looks baaaaaad
Eh… at least it will probably be better than Assassin's Creed.
By Elchele Go To PostA Friend of mine watched it yesterday. She's working at Sony Pictures. I hate her now
... is hot and single?
The Assassin from Assassin's Creed is banging Lara Croft in real life. That should have been the movie.
Lara finds some unearthly artifact that is linked and leads to the Templars or whomever the lead antagonist is from the AC series, and there's a crossover.
Lara finds some unearthly artifact that is linked and leads to the Templars or whomever the lead antagonist is from the AC series, and there's a crossover.
By Apollo Go To Post… is hot and single?yes. and wealthy
I like to think that the final sequences of the third act in IT work as a allegory for horror directors that rely way to much on the impulsive adrenaline filled fight or flight response, caused by the abuse of jump scares: totally ignoring the diminishing returns to the point of self sabotage and creating internal uncertainty.
Tim Curry's Pennywise is iconic, but I enjoyed this take on it just as much. 2017 Pennywise fit right in with the nature of monsters hiding in people's skin, or rather, the monsters that people can be, in this version of IT. While he is the definition of evil, the only differences between him and the parents are that he's a murderer and has a red nose.
The love triangle needed some more time in the oven. The "payoff" felt unearned in the end, due to two of the three having little interaction (awkward or otherwise) and them spending such a small amount of time on the backstory. If there was a weak point in the movie, it was that. Her choice was fine (that's reality), but in terms of narrative, meh.
Also, Bill (I think that was his name, the main kid) was a bit of a dickhead and an asshole in the end. Doing shit that seemed out of character, two seconds after giving verbose speeches about this, that, and the other.
Yea, I thought IT was great. Get Out is still my horror movie of the year, so far though.
Tim Curry's Pennywise is iconic, but I enjoyed this take on it just as much. 2017 Pennywise fit right in with the nature of monsters hiding in people's skin, or rather, the monsters that people can be, in this version of IT. While he is the definition of evil, the only differences between him and the parents are that he's a murderer and has a red nose.
The love triangle needed some more time in the oven. The "payoff" felt unearned in the end, due to two of the three having little interaction (awkward or otherwise) and them spending such a small amount of time on the backstory. If there was a weak point in the movie, it was that. Her choice was fine (that's reality), but in terms of narrative, meh.
Also, Bill (I think that was his name, the main kid) was a bit of a dickhead and an asshole in the end. Doing shit that seemed out of character, two seconds after giving verbose speeches about this, that, and the other.
Yea, I thought IT was great. Get Out is still my horror movie of the year, so far though.
By EldritchTrapStar Go To PostI like to think that the final sequences of the third act in IT work as a allegory for horror directors that rely way to much on the impulsive adrenaline filled fight or flight response, caused by the abuse of jump scares: totally ignoring the diminishing returns to the point of self sabotage and creating internal uncertainty.
I'd love to believe this is true but the film makes such overuse of its attempted jump scares the entire way through that I don't buy it.
By Elchele Go To Postyes. and wealthy
Bruh, hook me up this could be my way in
https://www.wired.com/2017/09/behind-the-scenes-blade-runner-2049-sequel/
He doesn’t want his 2049 action sequences to be too noisy or audacious or, as he puts it, “too Marvel.” Instead, he says, “I want to bring them down as close as possible to the original Blade Runner: more simple, more brutal.”
O BABY
He doesn’t want his 2049 action sequences to be too noisy or audacious or, as he puts it, “too Marvel.” Instead, he says, “I want to bring them down as close as possible to the original Blade Runner: more simple, more brutal.”
O BABY
Doesn't have that thick Sandler shticky gloss all over it either. It's the good type of Sandler.
Hoffman also helps.
Hoffman also helps.
By GQman2121 Go To PostDoesn't have that thick Sandler shticky gloss all over it either. It's the good type of Sandler.
Hoffman also helps.
That's because it's directed by Noah Baumbach aka the most consistent director in American cinema
By Apollo Go To PostThat's because it's directed by Noah Baumbach aka the most consistent director in American cinema
That would be Jeff Nichols.