Ant-Man (MetaCritic: 64, RT: 80%)
- Page 1 of 1
Thought it was decent. At times some of the very best MCU stuff, but some of it was exposition central.
Probably - and a little unfairly on my behalf - suffered from not being an Edgar Wright film, as so much of him could be felt in what the film did right.
Rudd and Stoll were good.
Probably - and a little unfairly on my behalf - suffered from not being an Edgar Wright film, as so much of him could be felt in what the film did right.
Rudd and Stoll were good.
I thought it was pretty good, some very funny moments and the action was great.
Could have done with some better pacing as the I felt the first half dragged on a bit, the second half made up for that by being awesome though.
There was also some extremely cheesy moments however they made up for them with some great humour. Especially the tea line.
Could have done with some better pacing as the I felt the first half dragged on a bit, the second half made up for that by being awesome though.
There was also some extremely cheesy moments however they made up for them with some great humour. Especially the tea line.
Twas good.
Nothing special or groundbreaking but nothing bad either (Build up took a while and villain was obvious and meh)
Nothing special or groundbreaking but nothing bad either (Build up took a while and villain was obvious and meh)
Seen this twice now and I really enjoyed the set pieces and little dialogue exchanges a lot more since I didn't have to focus on the story. The bit where he's running across the mock up car park/building as the bullets hit like bombs around him is brilliantly done (and very Edgar Wright).
Great performances too. Hope Micheal Pena continues to appear in MCU films, he was brilliant.
Now give me my 70s set Ant-Man tv show
Great performances too. Hope Micheal Pena continues to appear in MCU films, he was brilliant.
Now give me my 70s set Ant-Man tv show
T.I. had one of the funniest laugh out loud moments for me:
One could say, I let you let me.
It was his delivery and timing more than anything.
And the flashbacks with Michael Pena's voiceovers were pretty brilliant.
One could say, I let you let me.
It was his delivery and timing more than anything.
And the flashbacks with Michael Pena's voiceovers were pretty brilliant.
It was easily the worst MCU movie and the second worst comic book movie I've seen in theaters, only ahead of Batman and Robin. I really, REALLY don't get how people liked it.
Edit: That Luis guy was somehow more annoying than Kat Dennings' character in Thor.
Edit: That Luis guy was somehow more annoying than Kat Dennings' character in Thor.
By ratcliffja Go To PostIt was easily the worst MCU movie and the second worst comic book movie I've seen in theaters, only ahead of Batman and Robin. I really, REALLY don't get how people liked it.
Edit: That Luis guy was somehow more annoying than Kat Dennings' character in Thor.
Good performances, uniquely visualised action scenes, nice family-oriented focus. Nothing groundbreaking, but certainly better than lots of other comic book movies.
By n8 Go To PostGood performances, uniquely visualised action scenes, nice family-oriented focus. Nothing groundbreaking, but certainly better than lots of other comic book movies.Honestly, I don't think there was a single performance in the movie that I could consider "good." Every bit of dialogue felt forced and awkward. In terms of humor, it is to Guardians of the Galaxy what Baby's Day Out was to Home Alone. The action scenes were the only saving grace of the entire movie.
By n8 Go To PostGood performances, uniquely visualised action scenes, nice family-oriented focus. Nothing groundbreaking, but certainly better than lots of other comic book movies.IA. I liked it a lot.
By Moris Go To PostSomeone please get Micheal Pena more work.He just needs more tips!.
Also they should totally have him summarize MCU movies. I could definitely see him being on WHIH and summarizing what happens during each movie.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtJkDqZzoOFYbqwOIFn2Lng