By Smoke Dogg Go To PostShe referred to him as her partner in crime.Not really. You could describe coworkers like that.
Usually, that's a designation you save only for your significant other.
By FortuneFaded Go To PostNot really. You could describe coworkers like that.again a lot of these "but what about YOUR friends" comparisons are really in no way close to lining up with people who played thought control at the highest level lol. barack was having secret service take candids of him at the beach just to show off his beautiful black dad bod for women voters ffs
may as well say you can balance your checkbook so why cant the US control its debt
By FortuneFaded Go To PostNot really. You could describe coworkers like that.
Ok, so Bush was neither significant other, nor coworker.
What else can we scratch off the list?
But you say he's just a friend. You say he's just a friend. Oh baby youuu...
that's a horrible image in my mind :/
i am glad that the verbal attacks on presidential kids has finally died off a bit
i am glad that the verbal attacks on presidential kids has finally died off a bit
Thought about what other PR presidents did to win voters, and thought Lincoln might have wrestled to win voters
Sadly he didn't.
They did use the train rails he made as a teen as a centerpiece to portray him as a working man though, and it apparently worked.
Sadly he didn't.
They did use the train rails he made as a teen as a centerpiece to portray him as a working man though, and it apparently worked.
Negotiators in Brussels have reached a deal on a Withdrawal Agreement that would secure the U.K.’s safe exit from the EU with a transition period to prevent economic shocks, according to three EU diplomats.
Indications that a tentative deal at negotiator level was close, began to emerge mid-afternoon Sunday, when the U.K.’s Department for Exiting the EU released a statement that Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab would make an unscheduled trip to Brussels.
“With several big issues still to resolve, including the Northern Ireland backstop, it was jointly agreed that face-to-face talks were necessary ahead of this week’s October European Council,” a spokesperson said in a statement.
Subsequently, EU diplomats said a meeting of EU ambassadors had been scheduled for 6.30 p.m. Sunday evening. Three EU diplomats confirmed the meeting was to allow ambassadors early sight of the divorce deal.
One EU diplomat stressed “that the deal is at negotiator level [only],” so much could still change. Last week, diplomats were told a deal had been done by negotiators only for it to unravel amid continuing talks.
A European Commission official declined to comment, saying only, “Talks are ongoing.”
If the putative deal does not hit any road blacks with ambassadors it will move to EU27 ministers at the General Affairs Council meeting on Tuesday. Diplomats also cautioned that it could still be blocked by ministers in London or potentially by the Democratic Unionist Party who vote with Theresa May’s ruling Conservative party in the House of Commons.
The agreement is due to be discussed by EU leaders Wednesday night at a European Council summit dinner. Only at that point does it have sign off on the EU side.
The diplomats who said a deal had been struck were cautious, and one expressed particular concerns about how the package would be received in the U.K. May has struggled from the outset to navigate her Brexit strategy through the warring camps and interest groups: hard and soft Brexiteers, Remainers, and hard-core unionists, citizens rights’ advocates and business and industry concerns.
But even if some details were not nailed down, the flurry of activity over the weekend underscored the intensity with which negotiators were pushing to show major gains in the negotiations before the Wednesday European Council summit.
EU leaders have said that only if there were signs of such progress would they schedule another special summit in November focused on Brexit. After this week’s meeting, EU leaders are not officially scheduled to gather again until December.
Even if the agreement on divorce terms — including the fraught issue of the Northern Ireland border — passes muster with EU leaders and the U.K. Cabinet, negotiators must still agree the “political declaration” which will lay out the U.K.’s future relationship with the EU.
By DY_nasty Go To Postmy politcal ads against blackace would crush him long before primariesuntil I ran an ad starring your father
By Kibner Go To PostYou can't make this shit up 😂
By Kibner Go To Posteverything about this is fuckery
By Francis Go To PostImagine being Hillary Clinton.No
So if I blackmail my students for sexual favours, that wouldn't be an abuse of power because they are adults?
By FortuneFaded Go To PostSo if I blackmail my students for sexual favours, that wouldn't be an abuse of power because they are adults?Yaasssss
The times...
By FortuneFaded Go To PostSo if I blackmail my students for sexual favours, that wouldn't be an abuse of power because they are adults?How good are you on the sax?
By The Frankman Go To PostHilary might have wanted to reword that to "they were consenting adults"That would still be wrong.
…
Yeah I got nothing.
By blackace Go To PostNoI just can't believe she's finding ways to "defend" his cheating 20 years on. Have some self-respect, lady. It's like she revels in always being a loser.
Is there some detail about that relationship that I'm missing that actually does make it an abuse of power? Was she coerced? Threatened? Made to feel in some way indebted? Was she unduly rewarded, or made to think she would be?
You would be right to say that based on their roles, there obviously was a potential for abuse of power there, but where is the actual? I'll note that the article says nothing.
You would be right to say that based on their roles, there obviously was a potential for abuse of power there, but where is the actual? I'll note that the article says nothing.
It's the president lol
Bad enough when a professor does it but this is basically the definition of it
Bad enough when a professor does it but this is basically the definition of it
Student-teacher I could immediately see. Clinton and Lewinsky to me is just a boss banging the secretary. No big deal, unless it becomes one.
I say this as someone who was ultra-conservative (brainwashed) during the Clinton years and believed him to be the devil.
I say this as someone who was ultra-conservative (brainwashed) during the Clinton years and believed him to be the devil.
Elizabeth Warren is gearing up to run in 2020, according to WaPo.
I think she would make a good president but also dare say she'd lose in an election (if not even the democratic nomination).
I think she would make a good president but also dare say she'd lose in an election (if not even the democratic nomination).
By Pac-12 Go To PostClinton and Lewinsky to me is just a boss banging the secretary.That's also frowned upon.
By blackace Go To Postuntil I ran an ad starring your father
And son
By Kibner Go To Post
............*sigh*
This is soooooooo fukkery filled
nas lost
By Pac-12 Go To PostStudent-teacher I could immediately see. Clinton and Lewinsky to me is just a boss banging the secretary. No big deal, unless it becomes one.that is ultra conservative thinking at it's best to be honest
I say this as someone who was ultra-conservative (brainwashed) during the Clinton years and believed him to be the devil.
By FortuneFaded Go To PostThat's also frowned upon.
I have nothing against any company deciding to make rules against that. Guard against the potential, no problem with that. I completely understand it. But to sit there and label every single relationship as an actual abuse is just absurd to me. But again, being that it is indeed risky, make rules and fire anyone for breaking them and I have no problem with it.
If it were me taking issue with that article and Hillary's response, I'd start with deflecting and attacking Trump. He's not the issue in that article, her husband is. But then I think more about it, and I'm just wondering why she is being asked. Let Bill talk about his own damn sins. I'd feel the same way if they were grilling Melania about any one of Trump's infractions, legal or otherwise. But the article is quite short, so I don't know what in what context this even came up in her interview.
By Lunatic Go To PostPocahontas running in 2020 would get devoured.they'd ask if she was legal
By Pac-12 Go To PostI have nothing against any company deciding to make rules against that. Guard against the potential, no problem with that. I completely understand it. But to sit there and label every single relationship as an actual abuse is just absurd to me. But again, being that it is indeed risky, make rules and fire anyone for breaking them and I have no problem with it.I generally feel that if you can't get away with it in the army, it's pretty bad lololol
If it were me taking issue with that article and Hillary's response, I'd start with deflecting and attacking Trump. He's not the issue in that article, her husband is. But then I think more about it, and I'm just wondering why she is being asked. Let Bill talk about his own damn sins. I'd feel the same way if they were grilling Melania about any one of Trump's infractions, legal or otherwise. But the article is quite short, so I don't know what in what context this even came up in her interview.
By Pac-12 Go To PostStudent-teacher I could immediately see. Clinton and Lewinsky to me is just a boss banging the secretary. No big deal, unless it becomes one.She was an intern, iirc.
I say this as someone who was ultra-conservative (brainwashed) during the Clinton years and believed him to be the devil.
Sometimes you forget Monica was an intern.
and fucking hell Bill, at least JFK got Marilyn Monroe at the side. but Monica Lewinsky?
and fucking hell Bill, at least JFK got Marilyn Monroe at the side. but Monica Lewinsky?
By Random Ass Username Go To PostCouple of JFKs gals got murked you might not want to even bring him up at all.They are all living happily in a farm somewhere.
Proud Boys and far-right skinheads were caught on video singling out and attacking protesters in New York City Friday night.
The New York Police Department arrested three left-wing protesters Friday, but none of the skinheads or Proud Boys involved in the assaults captured on video are currently in custody. Police told the New York Times they were reviewing footage to “determine if other crimes were committed.”lol why am i surprised
One thing I want to know is how did the United States handle the last years of the Nixon Administration? I kept thinking about what Hunter S Thompson wrote during those times, and there are some similarities to now.
Still this is only one POV though.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/fear-and-loathing-in-washington-204130/
Still this is only one POV though.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/fear-and-loathing-in-washington-204130/
Yeah, but he could have gotten himself one of those assembly line blondes that seem to end up at fox news.
By Francis Go To Postamazing lol
By Smoke Dogg Go To Postlotus?
Don't sleep on Lizzy.
She ain't running for potus. She gunning for lotus.